Here are the actual facts of the incident gone viral online, in which a bloodied Kentucky doctor – Dr. David Dao – ended up being dragged off United Airlines flight 3411 in the bump heard ’round the world, along with the full text of the apology from United CEO Oscar Munoz.
The Internet in general, and social media in particular, has changed everything. There used to be a time when an airline like United could bump a passenger in favor of giving a seat to a crew member and it would barely be heard at the next gate over, let around the world. There used to be a time when a company like United could (literally) abuse its customers, having them dragged bloodied off an airplane, and the worst that might happen would be a picket line in front of their offices and a lawsuit. Not any more.
Whether you’ve seen the video of Kentucky doctor Dr. David Dao being dragged off United Express Flight 3411 or not, by now you have certainly heard about it. That’s because, in large part, thanks to smartphone technology, the Internet, and social media, the video of it is everywhere. And we mean everywhere. Not just everywhere in the United States.
In fact, according to news reports, more than 200million people in China have watched the video on Chinese social media site Weibo alone, and there is a huge outcry in China over the incident, in part because Dr. Dao is Chinese, and some reports say that, as he was being dragged off the plane, Dr. Dao said he was being targeted because of his ethnicity.
(It’s worth noting that United claims to fly more China-U.S. routes than any other airline.)
The basic facts as we know them at this point are:
- United Flight 3411 was full
- Dr. Dao was a standby passenger, who was already seated in the seat he had been given on standby
- The working crew on United flight 3411 had either not known about, or otherwise failed to account for, four other United crew members who were also intending to be seated flight 3411 (in other words they were not working the flight, but flying home or to another assignment)
- United made an announcement requesting that four passenger voluntarily give up their seats in exchange for compensation and a seat on a later flight, in order to accommodate the four crew members
- Three passengers voluntarily gave up their seats in exchange for the compensation and later flights
- In order to seat the 4th crew members, United bumped a passenger
- The passenger that was selected for bumping was Dr. Dao
- Dr. Dao did not agree to being bumped and refused to give up his seat
What happened next is what resulted in the video, and everything which has followed. However, as one might imagine, the accounts from those who were actually there – not to mention from all of the armchair spectators – vary.
In case you haven’t seen the video – and want to – here it is (but feel free to not watch it!)
|We know you're sick of ads on websites. But we still need to pay to keep the lights on for you. So instead of huge ads and video ads, we use smaller, plainer ads. Still, if you'd like to support the Internet Patrol but not the ads, please consider supporting us here:|
|Get notified of new Internet Patrol articles for free!
|Or Read Internet Patrol Articles Right in Your Inbox!
as Soon as They are Published! Only $1 a Month!
Imagine being able to read full articles right in your email, or on your phone, without ever having to click through to the website unless you want to! Just $1 a month and you can cancel at any time!
In fact, on just the above video alone, the comments about what a public relations nightmare this is are very telling.
A plane full of overweight White people, yet you kick out the one Asian on your plane, which happened to be a Chinese Doctor….oh the stereotypes are alive and well.
What happened to americans? americans always talk shit to other nations about human rights. What kind of bullshit. Overbooked has nothing to do with this old man. He paid for the seat, he choose the date and time of departure on purpose. He only defending his right. Can anybody here give me one reason of why they treated an old doctor like a terrorist?
And on and on.
The point is, in addition to all of the other issues that this incident has raised, this has become a HUGE media and public relations issue for United Airlines, thanks in large part to the Internet, social media, and at least one person being present at the incident with a smartphone.
To say that this video has gone viral is an understatement akin in proportions to saying that Starbucks has a ‘few locations’.
So, it’s not a surprise that United CEO Oscar Munoz issued a statement and apology. What’s surprising is that he did it just less than 24 hours ago, and more than a day after this video went viral. (That said, no doubt United is scrambling to CYA against the inevitable lawsuits – plural, as there will no doubt be lawsuits from witnesses who were traumatized by the event – that will flow from this, so Munoz had to wait until the suits signed off on anything he publicly said.)
Here’s the full statement of United Airlines CEO Munoz in response to the United Express Flight 3411 incident involving Dr. Dao.
Statement from United Airlines CEO Oscar Munoz on United Express Flight 3411
April 11, 2017
The truly horrific event that occurred on this flight has elicited many responses from all of us: outrage, anger, disappointment. I share all of those sentiments, and one above all: my deepest apologies for what happened. Like you, I continue to be disturbed by what happened on this flight and I deeply apologize to the customer forcibly removed and to all the customers aboard. No one should ever be mistreated this way.
I want you to know that we take full responsibility and we will work to make it right.
It’s never too late to do the right thing. I have committed to our customers and our employees that we are going to fix what’s broken so this never happens again. This will include a thorough review of crew movement, our policies for incentivizing volunteers in these situations, how we handle oversold situations and an examination of how we partner with airport authorities and local law enforcement. We’ll communicate the results of our review by April 30th.
I promise you we will do better.
No Paywall Here!
The Internet Patrol is and always has been free. We don't hide our articles behind a paywall, or restrict the number of articles you can read in a month if you don't give us money. That said, it does cost us money to run the site, so if something you read here was helpful or useful, won't you consider donating something to help keep the Internet Patrol free? Thank you!
|Get notified of new Internet Patrol articles!