Did you know that as much as 96 percent of all oil produced in the United States by fracking is condensate – a so-called “light oil” or “ultralight oil” which U.S. refineries are incapable of using? Let’s say that again: as much as 96% of all fracking product is unusable in the U.S.. So why the big push for fracking? Here’s what the United States, and the oil producers in the U.S. want to do with it: they want to export it! That’s right, they are taking it out of your back yard, and selling it on the global market.
[Note: There are a number of online Internet petitions to stop fracking to which you can add your voice.]
But wait, you ask, isn’t there a ban on exporting oil, and doesn’t it include condensate light oil? Why, yes there is, and yes it does.
As David Weinberg of Marketplace explains in a revealing news article yesterday called
Oil from Fracking May End U.S. Ban on Exporting Oil, “Ever since the oil crisis of 1973, when oil prices nearly quadrupled as a result of an OPEC embargo following the Yom Kippur War, there has been a ban on U.S. crude oil exports.”
However, Weinberg goes on to say, the U.S. Department of Commerce is poised to exempt two private companies from that ban, to allow them to export condensate.
There are a few refineries in the U.S. that can process it now, but most refineries are only equipped to process heavier oil; and while some of those refineries are now scrambling to upgrade in order to be able to handle the condensate, the upgrades are costly, and not in place yet.
But wait, there’s more. It turns out that condensate is extremely volatile, and dangerous to transport. In fact, a report in in the Wall Street Journal this week, Oil From U.S. Fracking Is More Volatile Than Expected, notes that “Oil from North Dakota’s Bakken Shale field has already been identified as combustible by investigators looking into explosions that followed train derailments in the past year.”
|Get notified of new Internet Patrol articles for free!
|Or Read Internet Patrol Articles Right in Your Inbox!
as Soon as They are Published! Only $1 a Month!
Imagine being able to read full articles right in your email, or on your phone, without ever having to click through to the website unless you want to! Just $1 a month and you can cancel at any time!
So, while state and local governments look at the fracking question, and environmental advocates and fracking oil and gas industry associations battle it out, we want to step outside of that fray, and ask one simple, overriding question:
“If we can’t even use what is coming out of the ground with fracking, and if it is so volatile as to be dangerous, why are we allowing it?”
|We know you're sick of ads on websites. But we still need to pay to keep the lights on for you. So instead of huge ads and video ads, we use smaller, plainer ads. Still, if you'd like to support the Internet Patrol but not the ads, please consider supporting us here:|
The bottom line is money; some will say “by exporting it it allows us to influence the global oil market, it will make us a stronger player, it will bring in billions in revenue.”
In otherwords, again, money.
It seems to us, here at the Internet Patrol, that when you balance all of the environmental and health concerns against drilling for a product that is a) dangerously volatile, and b) can’t even be used in our own country, the scales tip pretty unevenly.
Read the Wall Street Journal article, Oil From U.S. Fracking Is More Volatile Than Expected.
Read the NPR article Oil from fracking may end U.S. ban on exporting oil.
No Paywall Here!
The Internet Patrol is and always has been free. We don't hide our articles behind a paywall, or restrict the number of articles you can read in a month if you don't give us money. That said, it does cost us money to run the site, so if something you read here was helpful or useful, won't you consider donating something to help keep the Internet Patrol free? Thank you!
|Get notified of new Internet Patrol articles!