Popular Internet Microlending Site Kiva Funding Cockfighting - 903 Views, 1 Comment
|
Previous Article « Criminal Defendant Acquited Over Arresting Officer’s Facebook and MySpace Remarks
Read Next Article » Worst Problem on the Internet is Stupid Users, Survey Says
The Internet can be used for all kind of great things, and certainly one of those great things has been the development of the microlending sites - where users contribute a small amount of funds, and then the microlending site extends a small business loan (typically up to a few hundred dollars) to individuals to allow the recipient to get on their feet by starting or furthering a small business. However, one site is funding cockfighting, which is not only a horrible bloodsport, but is illegal here in the United States. Perhaps more astonishingly, the CEO of the site, Kiva.org, is justifying the practice! When it becamse public knowledge that Kiva.org was funding cockfighting (we hasten to add they are funding it in countries where cockfighing it not illegal - but it is illegal here in the U.S. where Kiva is headquartered - and of course the ethical and moral issues remain), Kiva CEO Matt Flannery wrote a blog post in which he not only rationalized and justified the practice of funding cockfighting, but he also provided advice and guidance for fellow social funders. And that advice seems to be “if it’s not illegal where it’s going on, there’s no reason to not fund these activities.” In fact, after a) admitting that he’s not a lawyer, and b) insulting his hometown newspaper for their denouncement of the practice (calling the SF Weekly a “sad weekly newspaper”), Flannery’s justification concludes: “So is it legal to send money abroad to further cockfighting in another country? I think so. Foreign commerce must involve the shipment of items to the USA or from the USA. In the Kiva cockfighting case, no such movement occurred. Sure, a Peruvian MFI staff member promoted a cockfighting venture on a website served up in the USA. Sure, funds flowed from PayPal accounts of lenders in the USA. However, no items were shipped. Thus, if we take the Animal Welfare Act as our guide, it seems pretty clear that Kiva did not run afoul of the law.” Is that really all that matters? It seems to me that Flannery and Kiva take the “conscience” out of social conscience. So, before you get involved with a microlending venture and contribute your own money to microfunding, you may want to check the organization of your choice out very well, and make sure that they don’t have a culture of funding activities with which you may not agree. (Note: This story first came out several months ago, however we only just now ourselves heard about it. You can see the original mea no culpa article by Kiva CEO Matt Flannery in which he justifies Kiva’s funding cockfighting here.)
Follow Anne on Twitter
Popular Internet Microlending Site Kiva Funding Cockfighting
Twitter Explained in Plain English
Previous Article « Criminal Defendant Acquited Over Arresting Officer’s Facebook and MySpace Remarks
Read Next Article » Worst Problem on the Internet is Stupid Users, Survey Says
Read more:
» Email Petition to Save NPR and PBS - Life Imitating Spam Imitating Life
» Politics of Spam Makes Strange Bedfellows: The DMA, “Slam Spam”, and the U.S. Justice Department
» New Online Monopoly Game Uses Real Streets and Google Maps
» Popular Facebook Online Scrabble Game “Scrabulous” Gets Takedown Demand from Hasbro
For additional similar stories check out our archives on Around the World, Internet Law, Just Plain Wrong
NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.
I think that Kiva is run by a money grubbing unethical amoral bass_turd. Yes you can justify anything you do with whatever twists you want to put on it… but is it moral and ethical is the real test??? legal has little to do with the question. By the way, I am not an animal rights activist… however right is right!!!
Comment by Joseph Curran — 3/20/2009 @ 12:05 pm