Keyboard Sound Spying Gives Away What’s Being Typed   - 2,571 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: Key clicks and other keyboard sounds reveal everything you are typing, all with a simple decoding program which turns keyclicks into their associated letters. In fact, the keyboard clicks allow spies to very accurately determine what you are typing. Researches say that keyboard click spying has a 96% accuracy.

Previous Article « Microsoft Sues Eight Companies for Software Piracy
Read Next Article » Snoozester Online Wake-up Call and Email Reminder Service Says “We Work!”

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Your very keyboard clicks and other keyboard sounds can give away what you are typing. That is the unsettling conclusion made by researchers at UC Berkeley this week, who announced that keyclicks and other keyboard sounds can be acoustically spied on and used to determine what is being typed.

Explains Doug Tygar, a UC Berkeley Computer Science Professor involved with the study, “It’s a form of acoustical spying that should raise red flags among computer security and privacy experts.”

The way that it works is horribly simple. You record or otherwise capture keyboard sounds, and feed them into a computer. That’s what the researchers did, taking snippets of ten minutes of audio of people typing away, and feeding the audio into a computer program which detected the slight differences between each keystroke. Once you know the language in which the typist is typing, the differences in key stroke become predictable. Couple that with knowing what the most common letters and combinations of letters in a given language are, and it’s pretty easy for a computer to turn those audible key clicks into the actual letters struck.

The implications are pretty frightening. Says Tygar, “If we were able to figure this out, it’s likely that people with less honorable intentions can - and have - as well.”

Keyboard Sound Spying Gives Away What’s Being Typed

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Microsoft Sues Eight Companies for Software Piracy
Read Next Article » Snoozester Online Wake-up Call and Email Reminder Service Says “We Work!”

Read more:

»  FlexiSpy Cell Phone Tapping Software

»  Study Finds that Apple iPhone Keyboard 166% More Error-Prone Than Regular Mobile Keyboard

»  How to Create Custom Notifications, Alarms and Ringtones on the G1 Google Phone - It’s Easy!

»  Proposed Law Would Require Cell Phone Cameras to Make “Click” Sound

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Hacking, Security

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »

  1. If anyone was to say that it work well, that would be BS. There are too many if’s and but’s to this. Like ‘but some people don’t hit keys with the same intensity’ and ‘only if someone typed a lot for the computer to “crack the code”‘. I’m sure you’d have to be listening in for awhile for the computer to put together the common audible clicks, determine intensity of the key press and the occasional angled or side hit of a key. Those would produce variances in the audible clicks. I believe the concept, but I don’t believe the simplicity of it. There are too many variables.

    Comment by Anonymous — 9/21/2005 @ 9:21 am

  2. This type of “spying” was purportedly being done by the good folks at NSA many, many years ago. There are plenty of legends about gifted people that were recruited to listen to taped telephone conversations from various sources that were being monitored by the Agency, listening to the background noise for typewriter activity. The use of hardware solutions didn’t hit the scene until much later due to the huge computational resources it took at the time the crunch all that analog data, as well as the less-than-optimum processing algorithms that were employed at the time.

    Comment by Anonymous — 9/21/2005 @ 2:21 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 9/20/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!