Every once in a while the issues around so-called ‘pink tech’ are revisited. Pink tech is basically when a piece of technology – say a smartphone or a laptop, etc. – is brought out in a pink color, to appeal to girls and women. The issue, says critics of pink tech, is that rather than attending to the actual technology needs of women, they are simply bringing out the same old tech in a new color. We’re not so sure.
Engadget was among the first to bring this contentious issue to the fore, in a brief 2007 article entitled Survey says women patronized by pink tech. That piece, in turn, was predicated on a survey done in the UK, by advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi. That survey, published under the title Retailers Told, Ignore ‘Lady Geeks’ At Your Peril!, found that, among other things, only a tiny minority of women (9%) feel it important that their devices ‘look feminine’.
On the other hand, says the Saatchi article discussing the results of the survey, “This is supported by qualitative feedback from opinion leaders and consumers who feel “patronised” and “offended” by the abundance of pink products available at the expense of the sleek and beautifully designed and packaged products they want to see.”
Consumers feel patronized and offended by the abundance of pink products available at the expense of the sleek and beautifully designed and packaged products they want to see.
Now, this was all back in 2007. So where are we today?
Still decrying pink tech and how it doesn’t cater to the actual needs of women. The article you are currently reading was prompted by a radio mention of the ‘issue’ just last week, in which a commentator was decrying pink tech in general, and how it doesn’t really provide women with what they need in particular.
|Read Internet Patrol Articles Right in Your Inbox as Soon as They are Published! Only $1 a Month!
Imagine being able to read full articles right in your email, or on your phone, without ever having to click through to the website unless you want to! Just $1 a month and you can cancel at any time!
And less than a year ago it was being invoked in an interview with, among others, Deldelp Medina, the female co-founder of accelerator Avion Ventures, and Director at tech diversity promotion organization code2040.org.
Said Medina, in the interview published under the title Why Aren’t There More Women in Tech, “A small pink computer isn’t terrible per se… Smaller keyboards are actually nice to prevent carpal tunnel in smaller hands. What’s insulting is if this computer comes with less processing power, memory or useful software than a regular one.”
“There’s a difference, added Medina, “between wanting to celebrate your femininity and shrinking and pinking something.”
Then again, to counter the anti-pink-in-tech wave, you have only to read Gizmodo’s Christina Warren’s piece from earlier this year, Rose Gold Is the Best Thing That’s Ever Happened to Tech and I Will Hear No Arguments.
Warren argues that rose gold, which let’s face it, is a) pink, and b) almost wholly a creation of the tech industry, is the greatest thing to happen to tech since, well, just about anything.
As the owner of a rose gold iPhone and a rose gold Apple Watch, this author is inclined to agree with the sentiment, if not the actual statement. BUT, and this is crucial, Apple has not dumbed down their devices available in rose gold – they all contain the same technology, be they sleek black, classic white, or rose gold.
Which leads us to ask, who cares what color the device is, so long as it is equal under the hood? Pandering to a particular audience is nothing more than marketing (some would say good marketing) so long as it doesn’t come with less horsepower or a patronizing tone.
|Get notified of new Internet Patrol articles!