Washington D.C. to Get New Anti-Spam Law - 1,421 Views,
|
Previous Article « Russia says “Nyet” to Anti-Spam Laws
Read Next Article » Windows Users: Urgent Update on Bropia Worm
The District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.) is poised to get a brand new anti-spam law of their very own.
Many people don’t realize that Washington D.C., while a “district”, is not, in fact, a state. It is the capital city of the United States, and there have been movements to make D.C. a state, the last one as recently as 1993 when a Congressional vote shot down D.C.’s bid for statehood, but at present it is not a state.
Nor, however, is it synonymous with “the United States”, having a fairly autonomous political structure, including a D.C. council. So for those of you who read the headline and thought “Huh? Don’t we already have CAN-SPAM?”, consider this your civics lesson for the week. This is about a law for D.C. itself, just like Ohio just passed their own state anti-spam law, and like Georgia is poised to vote on their own law.
In any event, D.C. councilman David Catania has introduced a bill to the D.C. council which would make illegal sending spam to a citizen of Washington D.C., or for spam to be sent from a computer system located in D.C..
It has all of the usual prohibitions against email with spoofed headers, and no working opt-out, but it also has a couple of unique clauses. These include no sending email to a domain whose registered owner lives in D.C., no sending email designed to elicit personal information through deception (Aunty can imagine spam which would otherwise be legal under existing laws, with legitimate headers and such, but which still elicits personal information through deception, so at least on its face this seems a good idea), and immunity for ISPs so long as they are not the ones which are actually sending the spam.
So good on ya, D.C. council, let’s hope that this passes for you!
Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!
|
Previous Article « Russia says “Nyet” to Anti-Spam Laws
Read Next Article » Windows Users: Urgent Update on Bropia Worm
Read more:
» Spam Haven State Gets Anti-Spam Law
» Voters Admit Their Vote Can Be Influenced by Spam
» Anti Spammers are Lamers, Says Spammer
» Microsoft to Spammer: That’ll be $7.4 million, please.
For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law
NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.
