Dog eat Dog: Scott Richter’s OptInRealBig Sues SpamCop   - 3,033 Views,

Summary: In a move which surprised many, but others not at all, Scott "I am a legitimate businessman" Richter, and his Evil Twin Scott "I am the King of Spam" Richter, of OptInRealBig, sued SpamCop and Ironport over a recent SpamCop listing of OptInRealBig. ...
   Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: explorer eats dog, spamcop why bother

Previous Article « What is Website “Email Address Harvesting”, and How Can I Prevent It?
Read Next Article » Dear Aunty Spam: Is the FTC Going to Come After Me?

Dog eat Dog: Scott Richter’s OptInRealBig Sues SpamCop        Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

In a move which surprised many, but others not at all, Scott “I am a legitimate businessman” Richter, and his Evil Twin Scott “I am the King of Spam” Richter, of OptInRealBig, sued SpamCop and Ironport over a recent SpamCop listing of OptInRealBig. Ironport, manufacturers of the Ironport email sending appliance, and providers of the Bonded Sender service, recently purchased SpamCop for an undisclosed sum of money.

In the lawsuit Richter, himself a defendant in a lawsuit by New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, for ..gosh…whodda thunk it…spamming, accuses SpamCop of interfering with OptInRealBig’s contracts and their potential revenue, and of defamation for calling a spammer, well, a spammer, and reporting them to their ISP, leading to their ISP cutting off their Internet access.

The amount of damages alleged, “not less than $150,000″ according to the complaint, is but a drop in the Kentucky Fried Chicken bucket compared to the amounts which Richter has claimed to pull in for even a single month’s worth of his high volume email deployment services. Yet Richter complains that the issues with SpamCop started in 2003, meaning that the issue has been going on for at least 4 months (and, let’s face it, probably much longer), and yet then goes on to ask for injunctive relief, which is, particularly at the TRO stage, to be granted only if the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the defendent wasn’t forced to stop the offending behaviour immediately.

So, let’s see, the “issue” which OptInRealBig has with SpamCop has been going on for at least 4 months, but has cost Richter only a tiny fraction of his substantial income from spamm..er…emailing, and yet all of a sudden now he complains about it, and right now, today, he needs injunctive relief.

Something doesn’t smell right in Denmark. Could it be that Richter needs to Lose Money Fast because he made so much money sending millions of pieces of spam per month that he Added 6 Inches to his tax bracket?

Or perhaps he simply wants to Fire His Boss, and to Work From Home, and sees Ironport’s recent multi-million-dollar infusion of VC cash as a quick way to achieve that end.

Or, who knows, maybe he’ll surprise us all, and show us that he’s as educated and savvy about the legal system as he is about the female anatomy, and that he can demonstrate to a judge or jury that he’s a clean, opt-in emailer just as easily as he can find a woman’s clitorious.

On the other hand, between Attorney General Spitzer’s lawsuit against Richter, and the amount of perjury which would likely be necessary to make the suit against SpamCop stand half a chance, perhaps he’ll just DoTimeRealBig.

Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!

SHARE:
Dog eat Dog: Scott Richter’s OptInRealBig Sues SpamCop
SOCIAL:        Friend Anne on Facebook        Follow Anne on Twitter        Twitter Explained in Plain English
SEARCH:
       

Leave a Comment

Previous Article « What is Website “Email Address Harvesting”, and How Can I Prevent It?
Read Next Article » Dear Aunty Spam: Is the FTC Going to Come After Me?

Read more:

»  Breaking News: Court Dismisses SpamCop SLAPP Suit Against Richter

»  News Flash: SpamCop and King of Spam Settle Lawsuit

»  Richter Crows, Eats Crow, as TRO against SpamCop is Rescinded

»  Court Grants Scott Richter TRO against SpamCop/Ironport

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


 
 This article first appeared on 5/1/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!