MySpace, which recently capitulated to legal demands and has started openly identifying and maintaining a database of sex offenders who have created profiles on the MySpace site, has accidentally branded an innocent woman, Jessica Davis, as a sex offender.
Unfortunately, the innocent Jessica Davis, who lives in Colorado, shares the same name as an actual sex offender named Jessica Davis, who lives in Utah.
It all started last week when the innocent Jessica Davis received an email from MySpace, saying that “It has come to MySpace’s attention that you are a registered sex offender in one or more jurisdictions.” She had 14 days to appeal the removal of her profile and the addition of her name to the MySpace sex offenders database.
But it took her less than 14 minutes to respond, as she instantly fired off a reply saying “You have the wrong person!” and adding that “I want to inform you that I am NOT a sex offender, let me repeat my self, I am NOT a sex offender. You have the wrong person and I’m horrified and appalled at such an accusation. I would like to know where you got this information and would like this matter cleared up ASAP.”
And, MySpace did indeed have the wrong person, but that apparently didn’t move them. After not hearing back from them and, most likely understandably nervous about this, Jessica wrote to them again. This time she heard back from them, in a response which showed a stunning lack of concern over their falsely branding her as a sex offender: “We do not keep records of removed profiles or images. If it was removed by MySpace it was because of a violation of our terms and conditions — which can include a number of things (underage, inappropriate images, cyber bullying, spam, etc). Please review our terms for further assistance.”
|Get notified of new Internet Patrol articles for free!
|Or Read Internet Patrol Articles Right in Your Inbox!
as Soon as They are Published! Only $1 a Month!
Imagine being able to read full articles right in your email, or on your phone, without ever having to click through to the website unless you want to! Just $1 a month and you can cancel at any time!
Fortunately for Jessica Davis (the innocent), the company that actually reviews profiles and maintains the sex offender database for MySpace, Sentinal, got involved. In fact, Sentinal’s CEO, John Cardillo, himself got involved, and in a brief phone conversation was able to clearly establish that Jessica Davis (of Colorado) was not the Jessica Davis the sex offender (of Utah).
“The Jessica Davis in question is absolutely not a sex offender,” said Cardillo, adding that “It was so close, it was one of those rare instances where there was nothing else we could have done but flag her.”
It turns out that Jessica Davis the innocent and Jessica Davis the sex offender had dates of birth that were two days apart – but also two years apart. Also, they both lived in Florida at the same time.
Is that enough to presume someone guilty until proven innocent? And what about the next innocent that MySpace brands “guilty”? Will Sentinal’s CEO get personally involved in every case of MySpace misidentification?
|We know you're sick of ads on websites. But we still need to pay to keep the lights on for you. So instead of huge ads and video ads, we use smaller, plainer ads. Still, if you'd like to support the Internet Patrol but not the ads, please consider supporting us here:|
Of course, thousands of people are falsely identified as sex offenders every year – most in the context of a mother falsely accusing a father of abusing their child in order to gain the upper hand in a divorce case.
But here, MySpace not only wrongly branded Jessica Davis (of Colorado) as a sex offender, but they apparently didn’t care, even though her name would go into their database, to which all sorts of agencies have access.
Ironically, Jessica plans to go to law school and to practice law in the public sector. Perhaps she’ll work to advocate for those falsely accused of sexual abuse.
No Paywall Here!
The Internet Patrol is and always has been free. We don't hide our articles behind a paywall, or restrict the number of articles you can read in a month if you don't give us money. That said, it does cost us money to run the site, so if something you read here was helpful or useful, won't you consider donating something to help keep the Internet Patrol free? Thank you!
|Get notified of new Internet Patrol articles!