Meta, the parent company of Facebook, is once again flexing its muscles and employing a well-known strategy to combat California’s Journalism Preservation Act, a proposal that would require dominant platforms to pay news outlets for the distribution of their content. Meta’s response? Threatening to remove news content from Facebook in the state of California, a tactic they have used in the past to oppose similar regulations both in the United States and abroad. While Meta’s move has drawn criticism, the bill has managed to pass the State Assembly, signaling a strong statement in support of journalism and a free press. Let’s delve into the details and explore the ongoing battle between Meta and California.
Meta’s Familiar Playbook:
Meta’s playbook isn’t exactly a new one. They previously implemented a similar strategy in Australia, where they restricted access to news links when the government proposed a bill mandating payment to news outlets by dominant platforms like Facebook and Google. However, Facebook eventually backtracked after negotiations and amendments were made. In the face of U.S. legislation, Meta once again raised the specter of removing news content from their platform. While these tactics may have had some impact, they haven’t deterred the progress of similar proposals in Canada and California.
California’s Journalism Preservation Act:
Despite Meta’s threats, the California Journalism Preservation Act managed to pass the Assembly with an impressive vote of 46-6. The bill aims to require tech platforms that distribute news content to compensate news outlets for their content. The News Media Alliance, along with the California Broadcasters Association and California News Publishers Association, expressed their support for the bill, emphasizing the economic value of news and the need for fair compensation.
Opposition and Backlash:
Unsurprisingly, Meta is not the only party opposing these regulations. Tech industry groups such as Chamber of Progress and the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA), which count Meta and Google among their partners, have aligned themselves against the California proposals. Free Press, a non-profit media advocacy group, is also urging lawmakers to reject the bill, arguing that it could further harm local news outlets and create a toxic information environment that prioritizes clickbait over public-interest journalism.
The Fight Continues:
While Meta’s threats and opposition from various groups have added fuel to the fire, proponents of the bill remain steadfast in their support. The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA), a federal proposal similar to California’s, has garnered bipartisan support and was reintroduced in the Senate this year. Civil society organizations have voiced concerns about potential content moderation challenges and the obligation for platforms to carry any digital journalism provider’s content, regardless of its extremity.
The Internet Patrol is completely free, and reader-supported. Your tips via CashApp, Venmo, or Paypal are appreciated! Receipts will come from ISIPP.
CashApp us
Venmo us
Paypal us
Conclusion:
As the battle between Meta and regulators heats up, the fate of California’s Journalism Preservation Act hangs in the balance. Meta’s tried-and-tested playbook of threatening to remove news content has been met with criticism and backlash from news organizations and supporters of the bill. Nevertheless, the bill has successfully passed the Assembly, signaling a commitment to valuing journalism and defending the principles of a free press. Only time will tell how this clash between tech giants and regulators will unfold, and whether California will become a precedent-setter for news compensation regulations in the digital age.
The Internet Patrol is completely free, and reader-supported. Your tips via CashApp, Venmo, or Paypal are appreciated! Receipts will come from ISIPP.
CashApp us
Venmo us
Paypal us
