ISP RoadRunner Must Give Up Identity of User Claimed to Slander Public Relations Society of America’s Bolton

The Internet Patrol default featured image
Share the knowledge

A New York judge has ruled that Internet service provider RoadRunner must reveal the identity of a customer who sent email to the Public Relations Society of America’s board of directors, claiming that the Public Relations Society of America’s executive director, Catherine A. Bolton, was not fit for the position.

The anonymous sender, labelled “Doe” in the lawsuit now being pursued by both Bolton and the PRSA, is apparently an employee or former employee of the Public Relations Society of America, and claimed in the email that Bolton “is a fast-talking nonstrategic PR person. She cannot manage or lead an organization. Her quarterly reports to staff are garbage, often met with rolling eyes.”

The Court, in ruling that Bolton (although not the PRSA) had met the legal requirements necessary to compel the disclosure of the sender’s identity, held that Bolton had demonstrated that there was an action for defamation, her request had been targeted and specific, that she needed the information, and that there was no other way to obtain the information, and this was weighed against Doe’s likely expectation of privacy.

Of course, the conundrum here is that the truth is a defense to a charge of defamation. How ironic it will be if after all of this, it turns out that the allegations in the email were absolutely true!

Get New Internet Patrol Articles by Email!

The Internet Patrol is completely free, and reader-supported. Your tips via CashApp, Venmo, or Paypal are appreciated! Receipts will come from ISIPP.

CashApp us Square Cash app link

Venmo us Venmo link

Paypal us Paypal link

 


Share the knowledge

2 thoughts on “ISP RoadRunner Must Give Up Identity of User Claimed to Slander Public Relations Society of America’s Bolton

  1. I believe in the rights of privacy. However in todays volital society I strongly support the Patriot Act and the appropriate Governments agencies to have the ability to use whatever reasonable avenues to enforce the countrys security. I really do not understand fully the importance of the case in question. So, I support only those areas that may envolve criminal or national security issues. Thanks! Bob H.

  2. If “Doe” had sent a snail mail letter, would the US postal service have to reveal their identity too?
    Or if he called it in…would Ma Bell be accountable? Give me a break…suck it up woman.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.