Comments on: Yahoo Sued for Failure to Remove Dirty Pictures of User

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:54:35 +0000

so what is the law there ,when it comes to the ex boyfriend?
i have nudes of my wife in public, if there taking in a public place ,hasn’t she giving up her right to privacy?

By: jimi

jimi — Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:50:33 +0000

lol….what do ya expect from such a lame ISP????
nearly a year since they nuked me, but they STILL won’t remove my geocities account…or allow me to access it, other than ranking on yahoo in my (used to be mine) guestbook…yahoo sux, why do ya’ll find that surprising?????LOL

By: bodykiss female adult service

bodykiss female adult service — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:25:18 +0000

plese LADY, get over it what’s done is done…. come get a job with us (BODYKISS FEMALE ADULT ESCORT/STRIPPIN SERVICE) (414)213-7286 {LOL}

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:48:36 +0000

“Her ex-boyfriend took nude photos of her.” How could he of taken the picture? She most likly let him took the picture, and if you read the Yahoo! Terms of Service. It clearly states, “Please be aware that Yahoo! has created certain areas on the Service that contain adult or mature content. You must be at least 18 years of age to access and view such areas.” Also, when you make a “profile” you can put -ANYTHING- on it. Since it’s a public profile, and will be view by anyone on chat. So it isn’t Yahoo’s fault, I blame the woman since she probaly did let him take nude pictures of her. And since she did probaly let him, he can do -WHATEVER- he wants with them. Since she probaly allowed him to do it. =

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 04 Jun 2005 03:48:41 +0000

Of course she had to know. Boy friends don’t use concealed cameras. Only landlords do that.

By: Tom

Tom — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 14:06:14 +0000

I dont know about you but i would notice someone taking pictures, while i was being sexually explicit with them. It is obvious that she knew the pictures were being taken.

She is not suing the ex because he doesnt have millions of dollars, this is a pure and simple gold digging expedition.

By: jm

jm — Tue, 31 May 2005 13:42:32 +0000

Sounds like a Money scam to me. Why is she not suing the Ex-boyfriend? Likely because he doesn’t have the $$$. Go after him

By: Tracy

Tracy — Tue, 31 May 2005 13:35:12 +0000

If you will notice in the article, the pictures were taken WITHOUT her knowledge or consent. It does not sound like she is in this for the money or she would have contacted a lawyer before she contacted Yahoo to have the photos removed. I think the boyfriend should be brought up on criminal charges for taking the photos without consent.

By: Suspicious

Suspicious — Tue, 31 May 2005 09:51:22 +0000

Maybe it is a scam to get money from Yahoo..After all she posed for the naughty pics for a guy..what did she expect, he would keep them in his scrap book?..Shame on her..Suspicious

By: netnomad

netnomad — Mon, 30 May 2005 16:52:53 +0000

A verified ID? The only ‘verified ID’ that most of these big dog content providers understand is a credit card. When the puritan freaks went postal on MSN two years ago, they decided to use a credit card as the ‘verified ID’ method and it shut down a lot of really great communities because believe it or not, some people don’t have credit cards and don’t want them.

Unless of course you’re talking about something else, but I can’t think of anything else. E-mail addresses are about as useful as a third armpit when it comes to verifying someones identity.

MSN already proved what happens when you make people provide their credit card information to use a service - the service dies.