Yahoo Refuses Family Access to Slain Son’s Email   - 2,625 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: There are just so many facets and angles to this story, it's almost impossible to determine if there is a right and a wrong, let alone who is which. Justin Ellsworth, of Wixom, Michigan, was killed last month while on foot patrol in Iraq. John ...

Previous Article « AOL Thief Can’t Plead Guilty, Says Judge
Read Next Article » Two New Windows Flaws Revealed in Time for Christmas

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

There are just so many facets and angles to this story, it’s almost impossible to determine if there is a right and a wrong, let alone who is which.

Justin Ellsworth, of Wixom, Michigan, was killed last month while on foot patrol in Iraq.

John Ellsworth, the grieving father of the 20-year-old Marine, asked Yahoo to please give him access to his son’s email account.

Yahoo politely declined, citing its privacy policy.

Now, this raises some interesting issues. Online privacy policies are (or should be) considered sacrosanct.

On the other hand, when you pass away, generally all of your possessions which are not otherwise divided by a will are passed on to your next of kin, in this case Justin’s father, John. This would typically include things such as letters and other mail, the contents of safe deposit boxes, the contents of a locker - all things which arguably are afforded the same degree of privacy while you are alive, but which pass on to and become the property of an immediate family member when you are gone.

Is email any different? Should it be?

Now, it may be that Yahoo would actually like to give Mr. Ellsworth the access which he seeks, but to cover themselves, they need some sort of legal impetus. It is not at all uncommon for ISPs to almost invite, and certainly welcome, a subpoena which allows them to divulge the misdeeds of a user which their privacy policy would otherwise prohibit, for example. Most privacy policies state quite clearly that if required by a court of law, they will share your otherwise private information. Perhaps Yahoo is hoping for a similar outcome here.

If Justin’s father decides to go that route, he won’t have to look far to find an attorney or two willing to take the case. In fact, offers of help have been pouring in from across the country. And not just from attorneys offering free legal services and concerned samaritans offering money, but even from computer forensic experts offering to help crack his son’s password.

Said Ellsworth, “It’s an overwhelming response. … Things are really moving. I’m very encouraged by it all, but I still have my reservations.”

It’s certainly a tough situation, and it will be interesting to see how it resolves.

In the meantime, of course, our hearts and thoughts go out to the Ellsworth family, and to all families who have recently lost a loved one.

Yahoo Refuses Family Access to Slain Son’s Email

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « AOL Thief Can’t Plead Guilty, Says Judge
Read Next Article » Two New Windows Flaws Revealed in Time for Christmas

Read more:

»  Another Slain Soldier’s Family Fights for Access to His Last Digital Words

»  Yahoo Gives Slain Marine’s Family Access to Their Son’s Email

»  Yahoo Greetings from the Yahoo Roof Party

»  Warning!!! Account owner that refuses to update his or her account within Seven days of receiving this warning will lose his or her account permanently.

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Email Hosting, Privacy

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »

  1. This is what courts are for.

    Comment by Fred Boness — 12/23/2004 @ 8:57 am

  2. Too bad that there is no mention of WHY the parents wanted their late son’s emails…the natural sympathy everyone feels for a parent wishing to have one last glimpse into the final thoughts of their child might be diminished if it happened to be that their were additional motivations involved (such as if the parents were perhaps seeking information to support a lawsuit against a defense contractor for a fauilty product which didn’t protect their son). Grief and a desire for revenge (or greed) each generate different emotional responses to the parents, and without more details, I’d say Yahoo was right to uphold privacy. Common sense dictates that if the son WANTED the info to go to the parents, he would have emailed it to them. The fact that he didn’t seems to indicate that his wishes were for them not to have it, and for Yahoo to do otherwise would be contrary to his last wishes. Yahoo did the right thing…at least as far as the available information indicates.
    –David

    Comment by David Rittenhouse — 12/26/2004 @ 4:21 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 12/23/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!