<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What You Read on Wikipedia is Often Written by the Subject Themselves, Wikipedia Scanner Reveals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/what-you-read-on-wikipedia-is-often-written-by-the-subject-themselves-wikipedia-scanner-reveals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/what-you-read-on-wikipedia-is-often-written-by-the-subject-themselves-wikipedia-scanner-reveals/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/what-you-read-on-wikipedia-is-often-written-by-the-subject-themselves-wikipedia-scanner-reveals/#comment-141330</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/what-you-read-on-wikipedia-is-often-written-by-the-subject-themselves-wikipedia-scanner-reveals#comment-141330</guid>
		<description>If I want to review a business I wouldn't go to their web site. I would try to find a group, or other non-related entity and apply a little critical thinking. When a business or individual has access information about themselves, why would they not change it? In some cases they are probably justified. I've seen many entries at Wikipedia that I know are wrong, and limits the credibility of everything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I want to review a business I wouldn&#8217;t go to their web site. I would try to find a group, or other non-related entity and apply a little critical thinking. When a business or individual has access information about themselves, why would they not change it? In some cases they are probably justified. I&#8217;ve seen many entries at Wikipedia that I know are wrong, and limits the credibility of everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
