Verizon and MCI: Email Refuser to Acquire Email Abuser   - 1,948 Views, 1 Comment

Summary: Verizon has been in the news quite a bit lately, and indeed here in Aunty's own column, for its dunderheaded refusal of email from large chunks of the civilized world, by blocking incoming email from entire countries. In fact, Verizon is being ...
Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: imei mci ir, imei track mci ir, phishmongers com block, WWW imei mci ir/

Previous Article « Windows Users Must Upgrade Messenger or Lose Access
Read Next Article » Phishmongers: WholeSecurity to Sell Phishing Alerts

Verizon and MCI: Email Refuser to Acquire Email Abuser        Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Verizon has been in the news quite a bit lately, and indeed here in Aunty’s own column, for its dunderheaded refusal of email from large chunks of the civilized world, by blocking incoming email from entire countries. In fact, Verizon is being sued by their users who have been unable to receive wanted email from other countries.

MCI, on the other hand, has been in the news concurrently for, it is alleged, hosting spam gangs and “making $5million dollars a year” from said hosting, according to UK-based SpamHaus, a well-respected anti-spam company which is generally careful and conservative with whom they label “spammers”.

Today it has been announced that Verizon is set to acquire MCI, for a cool $6.75 billion dollars. Of course, if the SpamHaus allegations are true, Verizon should recoup its investment in short order just from the spamgang customers alone (and given the timing of the announcements, it’s pretty clear that if Verizon didn’t consider the spammer income a bonus, they at least didn’t seem to care about the alleged spamnest problems of their intended).

More interesting to Aunty, however is that she sees this as a case of life imitating lilfe.

As in many marriages, Aunty suspects that in this union one party is going to talk - a lot - and the other is just going to tune them out. Or will Verizon accept the spam from its customers-in-law?

In any case, let’s hope that they have a good prenup.

Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!

SHARE:
Verizon and MCI: Email Refuser to Acquire Email Abuser
SOCIAL:        Friend Anne on Facebook        Follow Anne on Twitter        Twitter Explained in Plain English
SEARCH:
       

Leave a Comment

Previous Article « Windows Users Must Upgrade Messenger or Lose Access
Read Next Article » Phishmongers: WholeSecurity to Sell Phishing Alerts

Read more:

»  Send-Safe Sent Packing by MCI; Safe Sender Seeks Safe Harbour

»  Is Verizon Blocking Incoming Email from Non-U.S. Internet Domains?

»  Verizon Blocking Email: Couldn’t Get Email to Verizon? Couldn’t Receive Email at Verizon? Here’s Why!

»  Verizon Wireless Agrees to Compensate Customers for Lost Email to Settle Verizon Lawsuit

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Spam

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

1 Comment »

  1. I wonder if it would help if everybody emailed Verizon and asked them to ‘do the right thing’ ?

    Comment by Jim — 2/15/2005 @ 11:32 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


 
 This article first appeared on 2/14/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!