<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Utah Gets New Internet Pornography Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/utah-gets-new-internet-pornography-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/utah-gets-new-internet-pornography-law</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BanPorn</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/utah-gets-new-internet-pornography-law#comment-86706</link>
		<dc:creator>BanPorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=463#comment-86706</guid>
		<description>Finally!!!  They've needed to regulate porn for too long.  I hope a bill like this is passed in every state.  Although it should be a little more strict in my opinion.  They are going to need a way to govern these sites.  Unfortunately we won't be getting wankers out there like woody (first commenter) to help.  He is obviously not a parent.  So Im all up for doing my job as a parent and doing whatever I can to limit these sites.  Even if it is to go so far as to slap some sense into retards like him.  Who cares about employment!  I'd do it for free!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally!!!  They&#8217;ve needed to regulate porn for too long.  I hope a bill like this is passed in every state.  Although it should be a little more strict in my opinion.  They are going to need a way to govern these sites.  Unfortunately we won&#8217;t be getting wankers out there like woody (first commenter) to help.  He is obviously not a parent.  So Im all up for doing my job as a parent and doing whatever I can to limit these sites.  Even if it is to go so far as to slap some sense into retards like him.  Who cares about employment!  I&#8217;d do it for free!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZacOz</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/utah-gets-new-internet-pornography-law#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>ZacOz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=463#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>Actually this plan has nothing to do with internet pornography, rather it's a law designed to lower the unemployment rate in Utah. It must be, can you imagine the work involved in maintaining an up to date "adult content registry" that is effective enough to be worthwhile? Because it seems they are not talking about a register of keywords / bayesian filter data etc, but a register of actual websites.

But seriously:
If they want to do this wouldn't it be more efficient to require ISP's to provide adult filtering upon request, but instead provide ISP's a subsidy/tax rebate for the purchase of suitable commercial server based filtering software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this plan has nothing to do with internet pornography, rather it&#8217;s a law designed to lower the unemployment rate in Utah. It must be, can you imagine the work involved in maintaining an up to date &#8220;adult content registry&#8221; that is effective enough to be worthwhile? Because it seems they are not talking about a register of keywords / bayesian filter data etc, but a register of actual websites.</p>
<p>But seriously:<br />
If they want to do this wouldn&#8217;t it be more efficient to require ISP&#8217;s to provide adult filtering upon request, but instead provide ISP&#8217;s a subsidy/tax rebate for the purchase of suitable commercial server based filtering software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/utah-gets-new-internet-pornography-law#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=463#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Wow! Great! Awesome! So much for parenting I guess. Will they have laws to cover IRC chat, Instant Messaging, New Servers and the like sometime soon? We need to encourage parents to parent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Great! Awesome! So much for parenting I guess. Will they have laws to cover IRC chat, Instant Messaging, New Servers and the like sometime soon? We need to encourage parents to parent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
