Use Encryption - Go to Jail (And Watch that Search History Too!)   - 1,806 Views, 3 Comments

Summary: Just when you thought that the state of the law with regards to the Internet couldn't get any more convoluted, a Minnesota appeals court has held that a defendant's use of the PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) program can be admitted as evidence against ...

Previous Article « Stanford Computer System Hacked - Personal Information of Thousands Compromised
Read Next Article » Federal Law Enforcement Announces Operation D-Elite, Takes Down Elite Torrents (News Release)

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Just when you thought that the state of the law with regards to the Internet couldn’t get any more convoluted, a Minnesota appeals court has held that a defendant’s use of the PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) program can be admitted as evidence against someone accused of Internet wrongdoing.

The case at issue involved a man who was convicted of child pornography - specifically of taking pornographic pictures of a 9-year old - but as wrong as that is, the use of the mere presence of the PGP program on the defendant’s computer as evidence of his wrongdoing is disturbing. Indeed, according to news reports there is no indication that any of the files were actually encrypted, only that the encryption program was present on the defendant’s hard drive. Still, the court found that “evidence of appellant’s Internet use and the existence of an encryption program on his computer was at least somewhat relevant to the state’s case against him,” in ruling that the lower court was within its authority to allow evidence of the presence of PGP on the defendant’s computer to be admitted against him.

Also of note is the fact that the defendant’s search history, as recorded in his browser, was admitted against him. The searches were for the term “Lolitas”.

Now, it is also true that child pornography is a horrible crime, and in this case the victim testified, and they had the illicit pictures as evidence. But that doesn’t change the fact that the mere presence of an encryption program was allowed to be used against the defendant in the state’s case against him, as was his web browser search history.

Think about that the next time you do a web search, or encrypt a file.

Use Encryption - Go to Jail (And Watch that Search History Too!)

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Stanford Computer System Hacked - Personal Information of Thousands Compromised
Read Next Article » Federal Law Enforcement Announces Operation D-Elite, Takes Down Elite Torrents (News Release)

Read more:

»  Beware Google Archiving Your Entire Google Search History

»  How to Delete Internet History and Search History from Internet Explorer, Safari, IE7, Firefox and Google Toolbar

»  Google’s New Web History - What “View and manage your web history” Means for Your Privacy on Google

»  Blogger Josh Wolf Freed from Jail After Providing and Posting Disputed Video

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Privacy

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

3 Comments »

  1. In re to “Use Encryption - Go To Jail”: Wow! Our courts have been known to do some goofy things (such as aquitting O.J. and Robert Blake). Although it is not good that the “evidence” of an encryption program was allowed to stand, I don’t foresee this as setting a precident. Please note that I have no leagal training. I just believe that if the attorney for the defense would put on the stand several respectable local individuals or businessmen who will testify that they use the identical program, it will not only weaken the case against the defendant but reduce chances that the same ploy will be used as evidence in future cases.

    I’m with you - child pornography is a terrible crime. But real evidence should be used in cases against it, not the trumped-up variety.

    Comment by Jerry Lyons — 5/29/2005 @ 3:40 am

  2. I once did a search for “Lolita Fatjo”, amoung a few other people listed in the Star Trek credits. I also have a few copies of PGP.

    /me hides.

    Comment by Bill Godfrey — 5/29/2005 @ 4:40 am

  3. …is that you in the pic, holding the scales…Aunty Spam….you look HOT!!!

    Comment by Lon F Jarrell Jr — 5/31/2005 @ 6:14 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 5/27/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!