<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update:  AOL Admits Waiver of All Privacy in AIM Terms of Service is Problematic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/update-aol-admits-waiver-of-all-privacy-in-aim-terms-of-service-is-problematic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/update-aol-admits-waiver-of-all-privacy-in-aim-terms-of-service-is-problematic</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/update-aol-admits-waiver-of-all-privacy-in-aim-terms-of-service-is-problematic#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=446#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>The only real assurance of privacy is the level of business ethics in AOL's corporate culture. By the time a court ruled in a lawsuit, the cat would be out of the bag. 

I'm more sceptical than Aunty about the enforceability of the TOS; but, since you can never recover lost privacy,it wouldn't matter, after the fact, whether AOL ultimately managed to convince a judge that enforcement of the TOS would not be unfair, unconscionable, against public policy, or barred under the doctrine of estoppel after the public "clarifications" by AOL's PR Dept.

Either you trust AOL, or you don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only real assurance of privacy is the level of business ethics in AOL&#8217;s corporate culture. By the time a court ruled in a lawsuit, the cat would be out of the bag. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m more sceptical than Aunty about the enforceability of the TOS; but, since you can never recover lost privacy,it wouldn&#8217;t matter, after the fact, whether AOL ultimately managed to convince a judge that enforcement of the TOS would not be unfair, unconscionable, against public policy, or barred under the doctrine of estoppel after the public &#8220;clarifications&#8221; by AOL&#8217;s PR Dept.</p>
<p>Either you trust AOL, or you don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mu</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/update-aol-admits-waiver-of-all-privacy-in-aim-terms-of-service-is-problematic#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=446#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Whew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
