To All the People Whining That CAN-SPAM Hasn’t Worked 4/10/2004 - 1,161 views,
|
Previous Article « Yes, Virginia, there is a Spammer Clause
Read Next Article » You Have the Right to Remain Silent…. Fingerprinting Email?
It happens at least twice a week. Some reporter, pundit, or well-meaning but tunnel-visioned anti-spammer will point triumphantly to the fact that the load of spam in their inbox has not decreased - in fact, if anything, increased - since January 1, 2004, when the CAN-SPAM Act became effective, as evidence that the new Federal law has done nothing to stop spam. Well, yes. The thing is, CAN-SPAM is a law. That means that it is prospective, and its initial strength, if any, will be in enforcement, not deterrence (once there has been visible and painful enforcement, *then* comes deterrence). What this means is that in addition to the law being passed, a case needs to be filed, a trial needs to occur, and a verdict needs to be reached. Then, most likely, an appeal has to be defended. Even on the fast track, it usually takes months (sometimes on the order of years) before a case finally reaches conclusion. So, will CAN-SPAM actually make a difference? Yes, probably it will, but as but one of several tools needed in the anti-spam arsenal (the others being technical solutions and industry change, both of which are evolving at the same time as the law). But don’t take my word for it; ask Bob Vila.
|
|
Email the link for this page to a friend! |
Read more:
» CAN-SPAM Allows ISPs to Filter Email
» Imagine if Email Worked Like RSS
» Advertiser Accountability under CAN-SPAM
» Vegas Porn Spam Bad - Vegas Burlesque Contest Good
For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else, Internet Law, Spam, Spam Blockers
