<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thirteen Year Old Megan Meier Commits Suicide after Cyber Bullying and Online Emotional Attack by Classmate&#8217;s Parents Posing as Child</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mairi</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child/#comment-728317</link>
		<dc:creator>Mairi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child#comment-728317</guid>
		<description>I think it is absolutely disgusting how obsurdely immature adults can act.  Why would an adult be so interested in the doings of her daughter anyway?  It's not like it was any of her business to being with.  If she really thought it was that important, she could have investigated through diplomatic measures.

I also think that if Megan wasn't suffering from depression, she would not have killed herself.  I don't believe that it was something to get that emotional.  It would have been so much smarter and easier to just delete the account, and then leave.  But I also feel for Megan, and it makes me very sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is absolutely disgusting how obsurdely immature adults can act.  Why would an adult be so interested in the doings of her daughter anyway?  It&#8217;s not like it was any of her business to being with.  If she really thought it was that important, she could have investigated through diplomatic measures.</p>
<p>I also think that if Megan wasn&#8217;t suffering from depression, she would not have killed herself.  I don&#8217;t believe that it was something to get that emotional.  It would have been so much smarter and easier to just delete the account, and then leave.  But I also feel for Megan, and it makes me very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Vice</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child/#comment-257630</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Vice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child#comment-257630</guid>
		<description>On Wednesday, October 21st, city officials wasted no time enacting an ordinance designed to address the public outcry for justice in the Megan Meier tragedy. The six member Board of Aldermen made Internet harassment a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $500 fine and 90 days in jail.

Does this new law provide any justice for Megan? Does this law provide equitable relief for a future victim?

The Vice rejects the premise of this new law and believes it completely misses the mark. Classifying this case as a harassment issue completely fails to address the most serious aspects of the methods Lori Drew employed to lead this youth to her demise. The Vice disagrees that harassment was even a factor in this case until just a couple of days before Megan's death.

Considering this case a harassment issue is incorrect because during the 5 weeks Lori Drew baited and groomed her victim, the attention was NOT unwanted attention. Megan participated in the conversations willingly because she was misled, lured, manipulated and exploited without her knowledge.

This law willfully sets a precedent that future child exploiters and predators might use to reclassify their cases as harassment cases. In effect, the law enacted to give Megan justice, may make her even more vulnerable. So long as the child victim doesn't tell the predator to stop, even a harassment charge may not stick with the right circumstances and a good defender.

Every aspect of this case follows the same procedural requirement used to convict a Child Predator. A child was manipulated by an adult. A child was engaged in sexually explicit conversation (as acknowledged by Lori Drew herself). An adult imposed her will on a child by misleading her, using a profile designed to sexually or intimately attract the 13 year old Megan.

Lori then utilized the power she had gained over this child to cause significant distress and endangerment to that child. She even stipulated to many of these activities in the police report she filed shortly after Megan's death.

City officials who continue to ignore this viable, documented admission and continue to address this issue as harassment are intentionally burying their heads in the sand, when the solution is staring them right in the face. Why?

There are several other child exploitation laws on the books. To date, none of them have even been considered by City, State and Federal officials in this case. The Vice is outraged that a motion was never even filed, so that the case could at least be argued before a judge or jury.

Danny Vice

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, October 21st, city officials wasted no time enacting an ordinance designed to address the public outcry for justice in the Megan Meier tragedy. The six member Board of Aldermen made Internet harassment a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $500 fine and 90 days in jail.</p>
<p>Does this new law provide any justice for Megan? Does this law provide equitable relief for a future victim?</p>
<p>The Vice rejects the premise of this new law and believes it completely misses the mark. Classifying this case as a harassment issue completely fails to address the most serious aspects of the methods Lori Drew employed to lead this youth to her demise. The Vice disagrees that harassment was even a factor in this case until just a couple of days before Megan&#8217;s death.</p>
<p>Considering this case a harassment issue is incorrect because during the 5 weeks Lori Drew baited and groomed her victim, the attention was NOT unwanted attention. Megan participated in the conversations willingly because she was misled, lured, manipulated and exploited without her knowledge.</p>
<p>This law willfully sets a precedent that future child exploiters and predators might use to reclassify their cases as harassment cases. In effect, the law enacted to give Megan justice, may make her even more vulnerable. So long as the child victim doesn&#8217;t tell the predator to stop, even a harassment charge may not stick with the right circumstances and a good defender.</p>
<p>Every aspect of this case follows the same procedural requirement used to convict a Child Predator. A child was manipulated by an adult. A child was engaged in sexually explicit conversation (as acknowledged by Lori Drew herself). An adult imposed her will on a child by misleading her, using a profile designed to sexually or intimately attract the 13 year old Megan.</p>
<p>Lori then utilized the power she had gained over this child to cause significant distress and endangerment to that child. She even stipulated to many of these activities in the police report she filed shortly after Megan&#8217;s death.</p>
<p>City officials who continue to ignore this viable, documented admission and continue to address this issue as harassment are intentionally burying their heads in the sand, when the solution is staring them right in the face. Why?</p>
<p>There are several other child exploitation laws on the books. To date, none of them have even been considered by City, State and Federal officials in this case. The Vice is outraged that a motion was never even filed, so that the case could at least be argued before a judge or jury.</p>
<p>Danny Vice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "gunner"</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child/#comment-249499</link>
		<dc:creator>"gunner"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/thirteen-year-old-megan-meier-commits-suicide-after-cyber-bullying-and-emotional-attack-by-classmates-parents-posing-as-child#comment-249499</guid>
		<description>i'm in favour of old fasioned customs, in this case tar and feathers and a ride out of the county on a 10 foot length of fence rail for this evil, malicious hoax. shunning is also good, at least it works for the amish, nobody to speak to them, sell them any goods or service or even acknowledge their existence. the old norse custom of outlawry works too, put them outside the protection of the law for a year and a day, fair game for anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m in favour of old fasioned customs, in this case tar and feathers and a ride out of the county on a 10 foot length of fence rail for this evil, malicious hoax. shunning is also good, at least it works for the amish, nobody to speak to them, sell them any goods or service or even acknowledge their existence. the old norse custom of outlawry works too, put them outside the protection of the law for a year and a day, fair game for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
