The RIM Blackberry v. NTP Lawsuit Explained: You’re Not Likely to Lose Blackberry Service   - 3,148 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: The RIM Blackberry law suit with NTP has been in the news a lot lately. But what does this lawsuit really mean for users of the RIM Blackberry?

Previous Article « Tax Refund Email from IRS at GovBenefits.gov is Fake! Don’t Get Caught by IRS Phishing Scam!
Read Next Article » Woman Gets Face Transplant, But Why? Here’s the Real Story.

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

A lot of people are aware of the ongoing law suit against RIM (Research in Motion) over their Blackberry service. But what is the lawsuit, brought by NTP, really all about?

Research in Motion (RIM), a Canadian company, is best known for their ubiquitous device the Blackberry, which can be seen on the hip of every overconnected executive in the United States (except me - as many of you know, after going through three of them I switched to the Sidekick, with which I’m extremely happy).

Well, it turns out that a small U.S. company, NTP, holds the patent on exactly the sort of process and software which RIM uses to deliver to the Blackberry, and three or so years ago NTP sued RIM in Federal court. RIM suffered a stunning series of blows as a jury held that RIM had indeed infringed on the NTP patent, and that something had to be done about it. RIM faced having its entire U.S. operation - its primary raison d’etre - shut down.

Of course, we all know what these lawsuits are almost always really about: money. RIM realized that too, and worked with NTP to craft a settlement which would shunt to NTP an amount of money along the lines of $450milliion.

However, that settlement agreement was never fully executed, and so NTP took RIM back to court, demanding an injunction to stop RIM from providing the service at all to their entire U.S. customer base. RIM attempted to point to the prior settlement agreement, and the court ruled it invalid.

RIM also asked the court to halt legal proceedings until the U.S. patent office could determine whether NTP’s patents were valid. This week, noting the already considerable delay in these legal proceedings, and that the patent office could take as many as ten years to get around to reviewing the patents, U.S. Federal Judge James Spencer denied all of RIM’s requests, saying that “This court cannot and will not grant RIM the extraordinary remedy of delaying these proceedings any further than they already have been based on conjecture.”

RIM claims to have alternate software which it can deploy in the event of a permanent injunction against them, so that customers will still be able to use their Blackberries, but even if that software actually works, it’s clearly a last resort.

So it’s back to the bargaining table for RIM and NTP, with RIM up against the wall, and NTP in the driver’s seat. Insiders indicate that the new settlement figures being bandied about are up in the $1billion range. (It is believed that RIM has cash assets of about $1.2billion.)

Me? I’m so happy with my Sidekick!

The RIM Blackberry v. NTP Lawsuit Explained: You’re Not Likely to Lose Blackberry Service

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Tax Refund Email from IRS at GovBenefits.gov is Fake! Don’t Get Caught by IRS Phishing Scam!
Read Next Article » Woman Gets Face Transplant, But Why? Here’s the Real Story.

Read more:

»  Blackberry Customers Lose Service Despite RIM and NTP Settlement

»  BlackBerry Sues BlackJack

»  Blackberry Lawsuit Settled

»  Free PhoneSnoop Software Lets You Bug a Room with a Blackberry

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Handhelds & PDAs, Internet Law

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »

  1. hi, i read your article with interest….i am interested in why advantages and disadvantages you have with the Sidekick. why did you like it better? and why did you choose it? thanks johndig

    Comment by John DiGiacomo — 12/2/2005 @ 10:01 am

  2. With each of my Blackberries, within a few weeks to months the keyboard went. It started clicking when I typedin a way that sounded much like when you pop bubble wrap. When the third one went I decided to give the Sidekick a try. I had foolishly assumed that because the Sidekick was half the price, and the service was half the price, that it was an inferior device. I couldn’t have been more wrong. Just about every aspect of the Sidekick, from the form factor, to the keyboad, to the interface, is orders of magnitude better (for me) than the Blackberry. What it doesn’t have is the ability to interface with an Exchange server, but I don’t need that.

    Comment by Aunty Spam — 12/2/2005 @ 1:33 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 12/2/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!