The Problem with Site Blocking Browsers and Search Engines is That They Block Good Sites   - 1,050 Views,

Summary: Firefox and IE both have site blocking (or at least, site warning) built into their current iterations. Google also does site blocking now. All do site blocking based on some metric, known only to them, that tells them that a site is more likely than not to be a malicious site, such as a phishing site, or a site loaded with spyware. The problem with site blocking browsers and site blocking search engines such as Google is that sometimes they get it wrong.

Previous Article « Nevada Businesses MUST Encrypt Email Starting Next Week Under Law
Read Next Article » On a Personal Note: I was Featured in THREE Online Publications Today!

  Follow Anne on Twitter

Firefox and IE both have site blocking (or at least, site warning) built into their current iterations. Google also does site blocking now. All do site blocking based on some metric, known only to them, that tells them that a site is more likely than not to be a malicious site, such as a phishing site, or a site loaded with spyware.

The problem with site blocking browsers and site blocking search engines such as Google is that sometimes they get it wrong. In fact, this has happened to us when, for a period of time, and for no good reason that we could discern, I.E. started blocking our Crunchy Reviews site as a potentially harmful site.

That was just one site.

But this past weekend, Google, through their Firefox site blocking algorithm, managed to block thousands of sites, by blocking the entire mine.nu domain.

Now, the mine.nu domain is simply, in essence, a redirector. Anybody can create a subdomain at mine.nu and have it point to their actual website. This is a free service that has been offered by DynDNS for years. Among other things, it allows people who don’t actually have their own static IP addresses with their own servers to still have a web page or site.

And, again, thousands of people do just that. The Berry Linux folks use mine.nu, as does a Linux and FreeBSD blog. Many many people use mine.nu.

You can see how it might be problematic, then, when a giant like Google - with their ever-so-widely deployed FireFox - decides to block the entire mine.nu domain. Suddenly, thousands of legitimate sites were unreachable.

Now, we can assume that Google did this because they found some phishing or other malicious sites within the mine.nu hierarchy of subdomains. But blocking the entire domain just isn’t the right way to go about things.

And not to pick on Google, because of course this can - and does - happen with any browser or search engine that does site blocking.

The question is, how to protect people from themselves - and how to protect people from the people who aren’t protected from themselves. It’s not as simple as just letting everyone go to all the phishing sites, and hoping they’ll learn. Because it isn’t just them that gets impacted when they get hit with the latest virus, or their identity is stolen. For each instance of viruses, or stolen identity, several - if not dozens or hundreds - of other people are affected.

But the flip side, blocking innocent sites by the thousands, well, that’s just plain wrong.

The Problem with Site Blocking Browsers and Search Engines is That They Block Good Sites

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

Previous Article « Nevada Businesses MUST Encrypt Email Starting Next Week Under Law
Read Next Article » On a Personal Note: I was Featured in THREE Online Publications Today!

Read more:

»  What Do Women, Thongs, and Search Engines Have in Common?

»  Why Use the + When Searching on the Internet?

»  Open Source Web Browsers Taking Bite Out of Windows IE

»  Paypal to Block Apple Safari Browser, Other Browsers

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Around the World, Boneheads, Google, Internet Explorer, Phishing, Spyware & Adware

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 9/25/2008
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!