The ISPs Are Revolting! More ISPs Blocking Non-Native VoIP   - 2,273 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: Despite the FCC ruling that ISPs may not block VoIP, some ISPs are continuing to block VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) services which do not originate with them. According to reports, ClearWire, a Washington state ISP, is now blocking Vonage, basing ...

Previous Article « Something’s Very Phishy - Microsoft Files Trademark Lawsuits Against 117 Phishers
Read Next Article » Buy a Geek Book - Get a geek T-Shirt Free!

  Follow Anne on Twitter

Despite the FCC ruling that ISPs may not block VoIP, some ISPs are continuing to block VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) services which do not originate with them. According to reports, ClearWire, a Washington state ISP, is now blocking Vonage, basing the action on their terms of service which allow ClearWire to block the use of certain activities which result in “excessive consumption or utilization” of system or network resources.

Of course, ClearWire has itself just signed an agreement with Bell Canada to provide its own VoIP services, so this isn’t really about excessive use of bandwidth - it’s about use of bandwidth for the benefit of other VoIP providers. In other words, ClearWire, and other ISPs who are blocking Vonage and other VoIP service providers, want a piece of the action.

And that isn’t necessarily wrong, but it may be seen as anticompetitive. Does this mean that at some point that VoIP could be the camel’s nose under the tent which leads to regulation of the Internet?

ISP N2Net’s CEO, Greg Boehnlein, explains it this way: “As much as I want to see VOIP survive and thrive, I also don’t want to bear the additional cost of my customers choosing to use a competitor’s VOIP service over my own.”

And you can see his point. David McClure, president of the U.S. Internet Industry Association, puts it a bit less diplomatically when he says, of Vonage’s discussions with the FCC, “Oh, yes, we should run screaming to nanny government and get permission to stop Clearwire if we don’t like what they do.”

Still, ISPs carry network traffic for a broad range of services offered by others which they also provide themselves. What makes VoIP different from any other high bandwidth application?

Money, of course.

The ISPs Are Revolting! More ISPs Blocking Non-Native VoIP

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Something’s Very Phishy - Microsoft Files Trademark Lawsuits Against 117 Phishers
Read Next Article » Buy a Geek Book - Get a geek T-Shirt Free!

Read more:

»  VoIP Services Still Being Blocked by Competing ISPs?

»  How to Take Down the VoIP Competition if You are a VoIP Provider

»  Survey Says! Best ISP Is…

»  Biggest ISPs? The Answer May Surprise You.

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Providers, VoIP

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »

  1. The ISP’s should price their net connections with usage limits / excess charges sufficient to cover their expenses. Discounts or limit increases could be offered for customers who bundle their Net Connection & VOIP services from the ISP.

    If they are using bandwidth as an excuse, one presumes they are offering unlimited bandwidth accounts. However if this is the case then it is hardly unlimited if all high bandwidth activities are blocked.
    While it currently seems popular, blocking other providers VOIP data, is not going to be an effective long term strategy for these businesses. This sort of blocking will either die out, or the ISP’s concerned will die out when their customers get fed up and go elsewhere.

    As an aside Aunty, I think your statement:
    “Does this mean that at some point that VoIP could be the camel’s nose under the tent which leads to regulation of the Internet?”
    is a bit inaccurate. It’s not a case of the internet being regulated it is more a case of the ISP’s being regulated. The internet itself cannot easily be regulated due to the extensive number of countries and legal jurisdictions involved. The ISP’s however can be significantly regulated by the authorities presiding over their jurisdiction. One cannot state that the internet has been regulated just because legislation or regulation is implemented in the US.
    OK, will get down off my “the US is not and does not rule the World” soapbox.

    Comment by ZacOz — 4/3/2005 @ 1:36 am

  2. Let’s see - I have a 9 or 10 email addresses that I use for various purposes. With the exception of two I set up with my ISP (RoadRunner), all are from free email services Hotmail, Myway, Gmail, and Yahoo. Some are work related, others keep spam from my real email addresses.

    So if the ISPs can block VoIP signals legally, why can’t they block all email not from RoadRunner? Conceivably, there could be a lot of bandwidth taken up by downloading and uploading email. What about surfing on sites not related to TimeWarner (like this one)? That could be a lot of bandwidth, too.

    So, sic the regulators on the scum blocking legitimate traffic such as VoIP.

    Comment by Tom Woolf — 4/3/2005 @ 3:48 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 4/2/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!