Spam Haven State Gets Anti-Spam Law  
by Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. - 1 Comment, Last updated 05/12/2004

Summary: As you might imagine, Aunty got lots of calls from reporters today about the OptInRealBig v. SpamCop TRO. However, one call from a reporter in Washington D.C. took Aunty by surprise. They did not want to talk about Mr. Richter and ...

Previous Article « Court Grants Scott Richter TRO against SpamCop/Ironport
Read Next Article » Richter Crows, Eats Crow, as TRO against SpamCop is Rescinded

As you might imagine, Aunty got lots of calls from reporters today about the OptInRealBig v. SpamCop TRO. However, one call from a reporter in Washington D.C. took Aunty by surprise. They did not want to talk about Mr. Richter and SpamCop. They wanted to get Aunty’s thoughts on this:

Probably the last state on the planet to do so, Florida has just passed an anti-spam law.

Yay.

The law is very similar in many ways to CAN-SPAM, the Federal law which at least in theory will preempt this new Florida law. Among other things it provides for a fine of up to $500 per email/incident, and prohibits domain spoofing (or, as the new Florida law calls it, using the domain of a third-party without their permission).

Now all that remains to be seen is whether they will actually enforce it. Cleaning up their hotbed of spammers would also serve to clean up their name.

You can read the text of the new law here.

Sharing is Caring! Please help us get the word out by sharing this article on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+!

Previous Article « Court Grants Scott Richter TRO against SpamCop/Ironport
Read Next Article » Richter Crows, Eats Crow, as TRO against SpamCop is Rescinded

You May Also Like:

News Flash: SpamCop and King of Spam Settle Lawsuit

Breaking News: Court Dismisses SpamCop SLAPP Suit Against Richter

I’m Sorry Teacher, the Spam Filter Ate My IPO

New Spam Tactic Wreaks Havoc with DNS

Ohio Legislators Pass Tough New Anti-Spam Law

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else

 

1 Comment »

  1. http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3352951

    Comment by Anonymous — 5/12/2004 @ 12:34 pm

TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


We're sorry, you will only have to do this once:
Enable this image please
I see:
- +
- +
- +
Ironclad CAPTCHA (Security Stronghold)

 

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. In some cases, after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol. All that said, ads by Google are not our recommendations, and are selected and served by Google, and we do not control what those ads display.