Richter Crows, Eats Crow, as TRO against SpamCop is Rescinded   - 2,168 Views,

Summary: In perhaps the most content-free press release which Aunty has ever seen, Scott Richter yesterday crowed about the TRO which was issued against SpamCop in the Richter v. SpamCop case, saying: "A Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") was issued today by the United States District ...
   Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: what eats crows

Previous Article « Spam Haven State Gets Anti-Spam Law
Read Next Article » Dear Aunty Spam: Best Way to Beat Spam with Outlook 2003?

Richter Crows, Eats Crow, as TRO against SpamCop is Rescinded        Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

In perhaps the most content-free press release which Aunty has ever seen, Scott Richter yesterday crowed about the TRO which was issued against SpamCop in the Richter v. SpamCop case, saying:

“A Temporary Restraining Order (”TRO”) was issued today by the United States District Court, the Northern District of California, the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong, restraining and enjoining IronPort Systems, Inc., dba SpamCop.net, Inc. from:

1. transmitting or sending Complaints it forwards to third parties regarding Plaintiff (and its subsidiaries, divisions, companies, etc.) to ISPs other than Plaintiff’s originating ISP;

2. removing the e-mail addresses from Complaints it receives regarding Plaintiff and its subsidiaries, divisions, companies, etc.

Scott Richter, President of OptinRealBig.com, LLC stated that he was pleased that the Court issued the TRO and was hopeful that the Defendants would abide by the Order.”

Not 24 hours later, ClickZ reports that “OptInRealBig’s TRO Against SpamCop Dissolved” with Judge Armstrong being quoted as opining that “The legal issues are more complicated than they originally appeared and the Court has a number of questions regarding the facts.”

Not surprising, really, as the TRO was apparently requested and originally granted ex parte, meaning that the reason that SpamCop and parent company Ironport Systems hadn’t responded, let alone shown up for the TRO hearing, was that Richter hadn’t bothered to tell SpamCop about the TRO request and hearing.

Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!

SHARE:
Richter Crows, Eats Crow, as TRO against SpamCop is Rescinded
SOCIAL:        Friend Anne on Facebook        Follow Anne on Twitter        Twitter Explained in Plain English
SEARCH:
       

Leave a Comment

Previous Article « Spam Haven State Gets Anti-Spam Law
Read Next Article » Dear Aunty Spam: Best Way to Beat Spam with Outlook 2003?

Read more:

»  Breaking News: Court Dismisses SpamCop SLAPP Suit Against Richter

»  News Flash: SpamCop and King of Spam Settle Lawsuit

»  Dog eat Dog: Scott Richter’s OptInRealBig Sues SpamCop

»  Update on Richter versus World

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Spam, Spam Blockers

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


 
 This article first appeared on 5/12/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!