Public Website Has No Right Against Those Who Accessed the Website in Express Violation of the Website’s Terms   - 1,090 Views,

Summary: In the case of Snow v. DirecTV, a Federal court has ruled that a public website has no right against people who access the website despite the website having expressly excluded them from accessing the site.

Previous Article « Password to Unlock Files Held Hostage by Ransomware Trojan Revealed
Read Next Article » My Personal Blog

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

A Federal court has ruled that a public website has no right against people who access the website despite the website having expressly excluded them from accessing the site.

Stop-Corporate-Extortion.com was a website set up by Michael Snow, expressly for people being sued by DirecTV. As such, Snow expected that people would talk on the site about their cases (which they did), and so during the user registration process he expressly forbade any agent of DirecTV, including their attorneys, from accessing the site.

Well, guess what. Yep.

Agents of DirecTV accessed the site.

Snow then sued DirecTV under the Stored Communications Act (SCA). The SCA prohibits accessing an electronic communication “without authorization.”

Snow’s argument was that by violating the terms of registration for the website, the DirecTV folks violated both his website, and the SCA.

The Federal court saw it otherwise.

The problem, you see, is that the SCA prohibits accessing information which is generally restricted.

Stop-Corporate-Extortion.com, by contrast, was a public website to which anyone could have access; anyone other than the few people whom Snow attempted to exclude.

Explained the Court, “Before registering and logging into the electronic bulletin board, the proposed registrant is shown a notice that requires the registrant to affirm his non-association with DirecTV. Two options appear at the end of the notice: “I Agree to these termsâ€? and “I do not agree to these terms.â€? “If a person clicks on ‘I Agree to these terms’, that person is allowed to enter into, view and participate in the electronic bulletin board within the SCE Web site.â€? In sum, to access the electronic bulletin board messages, all one needs to do is register, create a password, and click “I Agree to these terms.â€? Nothing inherent in any of these steps prompts us to infer that access by the general public was restricted.”

Added the Court, “In order to be protected by the SCA, an Internet website must be configured in some way so as to limit ready access by the general public.”

Bottom line? If you want to be able to exclude certain people from your website in a manner which will stand up in court if they do then access your website, you have to exclude the public generally, and only let in people who meet a certain criteria.

The website at Stop-Corporate-Extortion.com is, by the way, no longer up.

Public Website Has No Right Against Those Who Accessed the Website in Express Violation of the Website’s Terms

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Password to Unlock Files Held Hostage by Ransomware Trojan Revealed
Read Next Article » My Personal Blog

Read more:

»  Adult-Themed Websites and Surfers Take Double Hit

»  Outlook Express Flaw Elevated to Higher Risk

»  City Sued Over Order to Remove Link to Police Department from Website

»  Should Websites Have to Be Accessible to the Blind? Lawsuit Against Target Says Yes

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 6/2/2006
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!