Prostitution Lawsuit Against Craigslist Dismissed   - 403 Views,

Summary: A Federal court has dismissed the prostitution lawsuit brought against Craigslist by Chicago's Cook County Sheriff's Department and Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart. Sheriff Dart had argued that because the Craigslist erotic services section helps to arrange meetings between hookers and johns, and steers people to places where they can pay for erotic services, Craigslist is in violation of laws against prostitution, and that it should be shut down. Dart added that "the sheer number of daily postings has made it impossible to stymie Craigslist generated prostitution."

Previous Article « Twitter Regrets and May Do Away with List of Suggested Users to Follow
Read Next Article » Free PhoneSnoop Software Lets You Bug a Room with a Blackberry

  Follow Anne on Twitter

A Federal court has dismissed the prostitution lawsuit brought against Craigslist by Chicago’s Cook County Sheriff’s Department and Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart. Sheriff Dart had argued that because the Craigslist erotic services section helps to arrange meetings between hookers and johns, and steers people to places where they can pay for erotic services, Craigslist is in violation of laws against prostitution, and that it should be shut down. Dart added that “the sheer number of daily postings has made it impossible to stymie Craigslist generated prostitution.”

However the judge didn’t see it that way, and dismissed the case based on, among other things, the
Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the protection which the CDA affords a publisher of Internet content.

The CDA is generally held to protect Internet site owners from legal action over content which has been generated and posted by the site’s users.

As such, wrote US District Judge John F. Grady, “Craigslist does not ‘provide’ that information, its users do. ‘Facilitating’ and ‘assisting’ encompass a broader range of conduct, so broad in fact that they include the services provided by intermediaries like phone companies, ISPs, and computer manufacturers. Intermediaries are not culpable for ‘aiding and abetting’ their customers who misuse their services to commit unlawful acts.”

To the Sheriff’s claim that the Craigslist erotic services section was simply a prostitution service, and nothing more, the Judge observed that ads for a woman who will provide erotic dancing services for men “is an adult service that isn’t prostitution.”

That said, a quick review of the “adult services” section this evening reveals ads that are predominantly like this one, lifted directly from the page:

5′7 135 34A …. ?Take a break from the norm and meet with a delightful lady with charm.?A beautiful Girl Next Door Type, You will enjoy my sweet and friendly attitude, allowing you to relax and enjoy our time together.I am available for Gentlemen who appreciate a Gorgeous lady like Myself. REAL PICS.NO DRAMA AND NO GAMES NO TEXT OR BLOCKED CALLS!!!!**100% INDEPENDENT
(( 970-930-0050 )) CHECK MY REVIEWS ON TOB. AVAILABLE MONDAY THRU FRIDAY 7AM TO 7PM (80 = 15MIN)(125 =30MIN)(175=60MIN)
(Sic)

Regardless of how one views the various services being offered in the erotic services - or, as it’s now known, the “adult services - section, the bottom line is that Craigslist cannot be held legally accountable for the ads of their users.

Prostitution Lawsuit Against Craigslist Dismissed

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Twitter Regrets and May Do Away with List of Suggested Users to Follow
Read Next Article » Free PhoneSnoop Software Lets You Bug a Room with a Blackberry

Read more:

»  Craiglist Sued for Being World’s Biggest Pimp

»  Craigslist Images Hosed

»  Craigslist Calls Hookers in an Effort to Deter Sex Ads

»  Craigslist Scam Hoax Leads to Woman’s House Being Gutted

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 10/22/2009
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!