Positive Recommendations on LinkedIn Used in Lawsuits Against the Recommender   - 771 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: Employment attorneys are warning of a new trend: the use of positive recommendations on Linked-In as evidence in lawsuits against the recommender. Here's how it works: an employer gives a positive recommendation on Linked In for an employee. The employee is later let go. The positive recommendation on LinkedIn now becomes ammunition and evidence in a lawsuit against the employer for discrimination, harrassment, or other improper firing practices.

Previous Article « Researchers Use Facebook and Other Social Network Data to Hack Social Security Numbers
Read Next Article » Spammers Turn to Short URL Services to Cloak Spammed Sites URLs

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Employment attorneys are warning of a new trend: the use of positive recommendations on LinkedIn as evidence in lawsuits against the recommender.

Here’s how it works: an employer gives a positive recommendation on Linked In for an employee. The employee is later let go. The positive recommendation on LinkedIn now becomes ammunition and evidence in a lawsuit against the employer for discrimination, harrassment, or other improper firing practices.

Even if the original is deleted, copies hide in archiving sites, caches, and even local PC files, waiting to come back and haunt you.

In fact, some employers-side attorneys believe that attorneys who primarily represent employees in labor disputes are already actively searching LinkedIn for these positive recommendations whenever they take on a case where there is a claim of wrongful termination.

It makes sense. If you fire somebody for poor performance, but have previously given them a recommendation on LinkedIn praising their work ethic, it will be easier to convince a judge or jury that there was some other reason that you let them go - such as their ethnicity or age.

Explains Wayne Pinkstone, an employment lawyer with Fisher & Phillips of Atlanta, Georgia, “That could prove problematic if a plaintiffs’ lawyer is mining these sites. The whole social networking issue is something that’s on our minds as management-side employment lawyers.”

So what should an employer do when faced with a request from an employee or former employee to provide a recommendation on LinkedIn or some other social networking site?

“Just don’t do it,” advises Carolyn Plump, an employment lawyer with Mitts Milavec, in Philadelphia, adding that “Generally, my advice is that I think employers are often better served by merely stating dates of employment, positions with the company and salary, and staying away from much more because there are so many potential ramifications if they say something.”

This is, of course, the line that employers in many states are already toeing when it comes to written and phone requests for references. It only makes sense that it should be extended to social networking sites, but the informality of the venue often leads otherwise wary managers to relax their guard.

The reality, however, is that if anything, posting something publicly on the Internet requires more vigilence, as whatever you post online becomes part of an indefatigable permanent Internet record, where even if the original is deleted, copies hide in archiving sites, caches, and even local PC files, waiting to come back and haunt you.

As Plump sums up so succinctly, “If they say something negative, there could be a lawsuit. If they say something positive, there could be a lawsuit.”

So don’t say anything at all.

Positive Recommendations on LinkedIn Used in Lawsuits Against the Recommender

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Researchers Use Facebook and Other Social Network Data to Hack Social Security Numbers
Read Next Article » Spammers Turn to Short URL Services to Cloak Spammed Sites URLs

Read more:

»  Earthlink Files Four New Lawsuits Under That “Miserable Failure”, CAN-SPAM

»  Microsoft and Pfizer Penetrate Viagra Spam Ring, Get Hard Evidence

»  Aunty Spam’s Big Book of Spam Filters

»  Something’s Very Phishy - Microsoft Files Trademark Lawsuits Against 117 Phishers

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »

  1. I see the use of this, but I find it unrealistic that an employer, specifically managers, need to fear that recommendations are somehow guarantees or extensions to employment.

    What are recommendations? Opinions, personal accounts and effectively “hearsay.” Not only that, recommendations can be willfully removed anytime, should a conflict of interest arise.

    I’m not a lawyer, but I want to caution others to think realistically. If someone plans to sue their (former) employer, a LinkedIn recommendation isn’t why.

    ~Joe

    Comment by Joe Manna — 7/8/2009 @ 12:43 pm

  2. Joe - the issue is when the employer themselves says, publicly “You did a great job,” and then later lets the employee go (or vice versa). The lawsuit becomes (in part) “If I did such a great job, why did you let me go? It must be because of discrimination, because you already admitted that I did a great job.”

    Comment by The Internet Patrol — 7/8/2009 @ 1:06 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 7/8/2009
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!