Politics of Spam Makes Strange Bedfellows: The DMA, “Slam Spam”, and the U.S. Justice Department   - 1,579 Views,

Summary: On a sidenote to the much ballyhooed crackdown by the Justice Department on dozens of spammers, at least part of the funding for the crackdown came through the Direct Marketing Association's "Operation Slam Spam". The law under which these stings were made, CAN-SPAM, has ...

Previous Article « Justice Department Takes “Slam Spam” Literally and Puts it to Dozens of Spammers
Read Next Article » “Knock knock” “Who’s there?” “John Ashcroft”

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

On a sidenote to the much ballyhooed crackdown by the Justice Department on dozens of spammers, at least part of the funding for the crackdown came through the Direct Marketing Association’s “Operation Slam Spam”.

The law under which these stings were made, CAN-SPAM, has been depicted as a win for online marketers - the DMA’s primary constituency - rather than a blow to spammers. The DMA set up and funded “Operation Slam Spam” because, as former DMA president Bob Weitzen put it, “We felt that the key to the new law was enforcement.”

Despite the DMA’s generousity, many question the motives behind the DMA’s funding of Operation Slam Spam, pointing to the DMA’s own defense of its members’ practice of sending email to peope who did have not explicitly requested it.

Said anti-spammer Huey Callison, “..if it’s unsolicited and bulk, it’s spam, regardless of whether it’s Hot Teen Girls Want To Make $20,000 Nigerian Penis Larger A Week In Your Free Time, or the weekly specials from Home Depot. “Spam is, of course, something other than what we’re doing” is only a good definition when used as a red flag. I’ve only met [former DMA president Bob Weitzen] once, but I think it’s pretty telling that the only person who agreed with [his position on what is spam] at the FTC forum was [noted spammer] Tom Cowles. If he’s pickin’ teams, “…he chose… …poorly”. Has the DMA ever come out and said “we’ve rethought that position”? If they haven’t, well, the way I see it, their money supporting the feds’ investigations is as green as anybody’s, but their credibility is still parked out back in the weeds.”

It may be “slam spam” but it’s hardly a slam dunk for the DMA’s murky reputation when it comes to its spam policies for its own members.

Politics of Spam Makes Strange Bedfellows: The DMA, “Slam Spam”, and the U.S. Justice Department

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Justice Department Takes “Slam Spam” Literally and Puts it to Dozens of Spammers
Read Next Article » “Knock knock” “Who’s there?” “John Ashcroft”

Read more:

»  Justice Department Takes “Slam Spam” Literally and Puts it to Dozens of Spammers

»  Sonny Outlook for Peachy Anti-Spam Law in Georgia

»  Aunty Gets Some Strange Searches

»  Ever Wonder How Much Spam Bill Gates Gets?

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else, Spam Whacks

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 8/25/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!