Personal IP Addresses Not Protected by Privacy Rules in UK, Germany   - 1,385 Views,

Summary: A German court has ruled that an IP address is not afforded the same privacy protections that Internet users enjoy for their names and other personally identifying information, even though a user may have a static IP address which is directly linked to the user alone.
Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: germany t-online law privacy ip address, what is that my ip server is not protected, most recent working german ip, personal ip, privacy static dynamic IP addresses mobile internet, german ip numbers, protected ip addresses, static ip germany, UK IP address in Germany, mobile ip address rules, ip addresses rules, ip address privacy germany, IP address personally identifiable germany, IP address Germany privacy court, germany privacy IP addresses

Previous Article « Craigslist Calls Hookers in an Effort to Deter Sex Ads
Read Next Article » Classmates.com Lies When They Say “Classmates Looking for You” Says Lawsuit

Personal IP Addresses Not Protected by Privacy Rules in UK, Germany        Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

A German court has ruled that an IP address is not afforded the same privacy protections that Internet users enjoy for their names and other personally identifying information, even though a user may have a static IP address which is directly linked to the user alone.

In the ruling that was handed down last week, the district court of Munich held that without additional contextual information, an IP address alone does not count as “personal data.” Personal data is zealously protected throughout most of the European Union - much more so than it is in the United States.

And while the same issue has not yet come before a UK court, the UK’s office of the Information Commissioner has published guidelines which come to a similar conclusion, stating that “In practice, it is difficult to use IP addresses to build up personalised profiles…. Many IP addresses, particularly those allocated to individuals, are ‘dynamic’. This means that each time a user connects to their internet service provider (ISP), they are given an IP address, and this will be different each time…. So if it is only the ISP who can link the IP address to an individual it is difficult to see how the Act can cover collecting dynamic IP addresses without any other identifying or distinguishing information.”

The UK guidelines go on to acknowledge that “Some IP addresses are ’static’, and these are different. Like some cookies, they can be linked to a particular computer which may then be linked to an individual user. Where a link is established and profiles are created based on static IP addresses, the addresses and the profiles would be personal information and covered by the Act. However, it is not easy to distinguish between dynamic and static IP addresses, so there is limited scope for using them for personalised profiling.”

Privacy advocates, however, including a committee of European privacy watchdogs known as “the Article 29 Working Party,” urge that IP addresses should be treated as personal data, both by ISPs and by search engines. The Article 29 Working Party argues that “Unless the Internet Service Provider is in a position to distinguish with absolute certainty that the data correspond to users that cannot be identified, it will have to treat all IP information as personal data, to be on the safe side.”

Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!

SHARE:
Personal IP Addresses Not Protected by Privacy Rules in UK, Germany
SOCIAL:        Friend Anne on Facebook        Follow Anne on Twitter        Twitter Explained in Plain English
SEARCH:
       

Leave a Comment

Previous Article « Craigslist Calls Hookers in an Effort to Deter Sex Ads
Read Next Article » Classmates.com Lies When They Say “Classmates Looking for You” Says Lawsuit

Read more:

»  “Gmail” Outlawed in Germany - To Access Google Gmail in Germany Requires Go-Around

»  Canadian Adult Entertainers Unwilling to Bare All to New U.S. Rules

»  Spam Blacklist Owner Not Responsible for Damages to Email Sender, Judge Rules

»  German Court Does Not Rule Email Blocking ‘Illegal’

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Around the World, Internet Law

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


 
 This article first appeared on 11/14/2008
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!