Newsflash! Federal Court to RIAA: No, You CAN’T Have that Peer-to-Peer User’s Information!   - 2,399 Views, 1 Comment

Summary: The United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, dealt the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) a blow today when it reversed a lower court ruling which ordered internet service provider Charter to comply with an RIAA demand that Charter turn over the ...

Previous Article « Most Hated Spam? Survey Says…”Business Relationship” Spam!
Read Next Article » Spam King Sanford Wallace Comes In from the Cold

  Follow Anne on Twitter


The United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, dealt the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) a blow today when it reversed a lower court ruling which ordered internet service provider Charter to comply with an RIAA demand that Charter turn over the information of Charter customers who were using peer-to-peer networks to download music files which alledgedly infringed on the RIAA or their members’ copyrights.

The Court held that the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) under which the RIAA had demanded the information from Charter was not applicable in this situation because the DMCA allows a copyright holder to subpoena such information only in conjunction with a demand that the ISP remove the infringing material, in this case the infringing MP3 files.

Only one problem with that: Charter had nothing to do with those MP3 files. They didn’t host them, they didn’t store them, they didn’t touch them at all, other than in the most fleeting of senses when their system acted as a conduit for their user who had connected to an external peer-to-peer network.

There is no sane argument which can be made which would hold an ISP such as Charter accountable for the actions which their users take on some other system. That would be like holding the telephone company responsible for someone placing an order by telephone using a stolen credit card.

Fortunately, the Eighth Circuit is sane, and reversed the somewhat less sane lower court decision, in keeping with a previous decision regarding a very similar demand by the RIAA to ISP Verizon.net. The majority for the Eighth Circuit ruling explained that the DMCA “only permits a copyright owner to obtain and serve a subpoena on an ISP for identifying information about an alleged infringer if the ISP is provided statutory notification which…requires the ISP to be able to both locate and remove the allegedly infringing material”.

Oh dear, RIAA, guess it’s back to the drawing board.

Newsflash! Federal Court to RIAA: No, You CAN’T Have that Peer-to-Peer User’s Information!

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Most Hated Spam? Survey Says…”Business Relationship” Spam!
Read Next Article » Spam King Sanford Wallace Comes In from the Cold

Read more:

»  Feds Score First Criminal Conviction in Peer-to-Peer

»  Double Whammy for Peer-to-Peer Creators and First Uploaders

»  MSN Blocks Porn Better Than Google and Yahoo

»  The Grokster Decision Explained: P2P File Sharing is Not Illegal!

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Music Download

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

1 Comment »

  1. Newsflash! Federal Court to RIAA: No, You CAN’T Have that Peer-to-Peer User’s Information!
    The United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, dealt the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) a blow today when it reversed a lower court ruling which ordered internet service provider Charter to comply with an RIAA demand that Charter…

    Trackback by Lockergnome's Net Patrol — 1/4/2005 @ 2:59 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 1/4/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!