News Flash: SpamCop and King of Spam Settle Lawsuit   - 1,833 Views,

Summary: Aunty has heard from a little birdie that the lawsuit filed by Spam King Scott Richter against anti-spam outfit SpamCop has been settled. As Aunty's gentle readers may know, Richter's request for an injunction was denied back in June, with the Court ruling that ...

Previous Article « For Sale: Your Email Address. Serious offers only. Inquire at Advocacy, Inc.
Read Next Article » Dmail: Alternative to Email Promises to End Spam

  Follow Anne on Twitter

Aunty has heard from a little birdie that the lawsuit filed by Spam King Scott Richter against anti-spam outfit SpamCop has been settled.

As Aunty's gentle readers may know, Richter's request for an injunction was denied back in June, with the Court ruling that SpamCop was protected under the Communications Decency Act.

Here are links to the history of this case:

Richter sues SpamCop
Richter granted restraining order against SpamCop
Restraining order against SpamCop rescinded
Richter’s request for injunction against SpamCop denied by court
SpamCop files SLAPP suit against Richter, court dismisses it

According to Aunty’s source, the terms of the settlement, under which neither party admits liability, include that SpamCop’s website and reporting policies will remain unchanged, as will Optinrealbig.com’s business practices and emailing methods. All other settlement terms are confidential.

News Flash: SpamCop and King of Spam Settle Lawsuit

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

Previous Article « For Sale: Your Email Address. Serious offers only. Inquire at Advocacy, Inc.
Read Next Article » Dmail: Alternative to Email Promises to End Spam

Read more:

»  Breaking News: Court Dismisses SpamCop SLAPP Suit Against Richter

»  Dog eat Dog: Scott Richter’s OptInRealBig Sues SpamCop

»  Spam King Sanford Wallace Comes In from the Cold

»  DeniedRealBig: Court Rejects Richter’s Request for Injunction against SpamCop

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Spam, Spam Blockers

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 9/2/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!