Network World Fusion Tests 41 Spam Filters, Here are the Results   - 2,045 Views, 1 Comment

Summary: Network World Fusion has just released the results of its test of forty-one spam filters! Apparently when they put out the word that they would be reviewing spam filters, they had anticipated that maybe ten or so would show up to the ...
   Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: Network World Fusion, test filters world

Previous Article « More Holiday Cheer: Control This Guy’s Appearance on National TV with Your Web Browser
Read Next Article » Former AOL Employee Who Sold Email Addresses Facing Two Years in Prison

Network World Fusion Tests 41 Spam Filters, Here are the Results        Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook


Network World Fusion has just released the results of its test of forty-one spam filters! Apparently when they put out the word that they would be reviewing spam filters, they had anticipated that maybe ten or so would show up to the party. Instead they were astonished to find forty-one showing up at their door! So they put them all to the test!

They tested each of the spam filters for “spam catch rate” (taking into account both false positives, and false negatives), and performance and throughput. Those which made the first cut (36 of the 41) then were really put through their paces.

The products included spam filters from all walks of life, and included those which had built-in virus protection as well as those which didn’t, those which were controlled at the server, and those which were controlled by the end user.

And, according to Network World Fusion, when all was said and done, they ended up with “a dozen excellent finalists, reflecting the growing maturity and commoditization of anti-spam products”.

Those making the final grade included Postini, Advascan, Mycom, CipherTrust, Borderware, Barracuda, Messaging Architects, Cloudmark, Sophos, Proofpoint, Symantec, and MailFrontier.

Not bad, considering that they had expected only ten entries in the first place.

You can read the full report here.

Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!

SHARE:
Network World Fusion Tests 41 Spam Filters, Here are the Results
SOCIAL:        Friend Anne on Facebook        Follow Anne on Twitter        Twitter Explained in Plain English
SEARCH:
       

Leave a Comment

Previous Article « More Holiday Cheer: Control This Guy’s Appearance on National TV with Your Web Browser
Read Next Article » Former AOL Employee Who Sold Email Addresses Facing Two Years in Prison

Read more:

»  Aunty Spam’s Big Book of Spam Filters

»  Over 100,000 Sources of Spam and Other Malware Detected in Any Given Hour - Many Zombies

»  Care and Feeding of Your Spam Filter (Train, Train, Train)

»  An Explanation of the Different Types of Spam Filters

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Reviews, Spam Blockers

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

1 Comment »

  1. Network World Fusion Tests 41 Spam Filters, Here are the Results
    Network World Fusion Tests 41 Spam Filters, Here are the Results 10:28 pm, 12/20/2004 ? You are here: Top > Product Reviews > This Article Edit This Network World Fusion has just released the results of its test of forty-one…

    Trackback by Lockergnome's Net Patrol — 12/20/2004 @ 10:30 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


 
 This article first appeared on 12/20/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!