Net Neutrality Clause Shot Down by Feds   4/27/2006 - 808 views,

Summary: Efforts to legislate net neutrality were shot down today, with the House Commerce Committee rejecting a rider clause to the pending "Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Efficiency (COPE) Act of 2006", and voting 42-12 to pass the COPE act absent the net neutrality clause.

Previous Article « Help Microsoft Test Internet Explorer 7! (IE7)
Read Next Article » Blog Postings Cost Lawyer His Job When Read by Judge

Efforts to legislate net neutrality were shot down today, with the House Commerce Committee rejecting a rider clause to the pending “Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Efficiency (COPE) Act of 2006″, and voting 42-12 to pass the COPE act absent the net neutrality clause.

The net neutrality clause would have prohibited Internet service providers from either charging extra for certain types of Internet traffic (such as those which consume a lot of bandwidth) or for traffic to competing sites, and from slowing down or blocking such connections.

Those in favour of a net neutrality law fear that the absence of such a law would allow large Internet service providers to penalize competitors by charging them a premium to reach the ISP’s customers - or to stifle competition by charging their own customers to be able to access competing sites.

Proponents of a net neutrality law also claim that without such a law the Internet as we know it is in jeopardy, as big business picks and chooses which sort of traffic it will allow, and the Internet as a boon for innovation and small business will disappeart.

Of course, this overlooks the fact that ISPs have been able to do this all along, and so far the Internet is still standing. It also overlooks the fact that the Internet was initially developed by the government and not intended for commercial use at all, so to claim it needs to be ’saved’ for small business and entrepreneurs is a bit disingenuous.

Those who oppose a net neutrality law, aside from the obvious big business lobbying interests, primarily feel that anything likely to happen in the face of no regulation is nowhere nearly as bad, for everyone, as what would happen if the government tried to get involved in an area which they patently don’t understand.

Regardless of on which side of the argument you sit on this one, fear not, it’s not going away. Opines Alfred Mamlet, head of the technology department at Steptoe & Johnson, a leading regulatory and industry law firm in D.C., “The House committee’s defeat of strong net neutrality provisions is just a preliminary shot in the net neutrality wars. While the full House may pass the COPE Act soon, it is unlikely that the bill will be adopted by the Senate before the congressional session ends. Net neutrality issues will continue to top the telecom agenda on Capitol Hill and at the FCC in 2007 and beyond.”

Get FREE email alerts of new Internet Patrol stories!
    *We never share your email address with anyone

Email Address:
Date of first visit:
How you found us:

Subscribe
to The Internet Patrol on your cell phone    Email the link for this page to a friend!

Read more:

»  Three New Competing Net Neutrality Bills Introduced in DC by Markey, Eshoo, Stevens and Wyden

»  Justice Department Takes “Slam Spam” Literally and Puts it to Dozens of Spammers

»  An Open Letter to ISPs re: Net Neutrality

»  California Seeks to Ban Remote Internet Hunting of Live Game

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Internet Providers

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


We apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day!

 
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!