Microsoft Takes Sender I.D.’s Case to the FTC Authentication Summit   - 1,856 Views, 1 Comment

Summary: Despite the miserable failure suffered by Microsoft's efforts to win support for their Sender I.D. email authentication system, with such august institutions the Apache project, the Debian project, and even the IETF's authentication working group all roundly rejecting Sender I.D. on technical as ...

Previous Article « Imagine if Email Worked Like RSS
Read Next Article » New MyDoom Worm Has No File, Just a URL, Exploits I.E. Hole

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Despite the miserable failure suffered by Microsoft’s efforts to win support for their Sender I.D. email authentication system, with such august institutions the Apache project, the Debian project, and even the IETF’s authentication working group all roundly rejecting Sender I.D. on technical as well as legal and moral grounds, and following AOL’s reversal of their rejection of Sender I.D., Microsoft has renewed their bid for email authentication domination.

Speaking at the Federal Trade Commission’s Email Authentication Summit, Microsoft’s David Kaefer, with their patent licensing office, claimed that the open source sector, of which Apache and Debian are part, were “ignoring ‘commercial realities’ that require his employer to retain substantial control over its patents.” [Translation: "The commercial reality is that we want to own the space and reap all the profit from that ownership."]

Kaefer added that “Intellectual property is not just an inconvenience that can be ignored. We’re starting to see patent issues and open-source issues coming together…There are commercial realities that come along with that.”

Countered Apache Software Foundation Vice-President Daniel Quinlan, “Key Internet standards currently are freely available, no patent licensing from Microsoft. We want to make sure it stays that way for e-mail and other important parts of the Internet.” The Apache and Debian projects’ rejection of Sender I.D. was predicated in large part on the incompatibility of the Sender I.D. license, and pending patent applications, with the way that Internet infrastructure software is typically developed and distributed. Enormous chunks of the Internet infrastructure are built on and require the free sharing and development of open source and open standards network services software. Microsoft’s Sender I.D. licensing scheme, as well as their patent applications for Sender I.D., do not support the free flow of development, improvement, and distribution and redistribution of email handling packages which would need to incorporate Sender I.D. into their algorithms.

You can read more about this here.

Microsoft Takes Sender I.D.’s Case to the FTC Authentication Summit

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Imagine if Email Worked Like RSS
Read Next Article » New MyDoom Worm Has No File, Just a URL, Exploits I.E. Hole

Read more:

»  FTC Says “No” to Do Not Email List, “Yes” to Sender Authentication

»  Email Authentication Shindig at the Federal Trade Commission

»  Apache and Debian Tell Microsoft that Sender I.D. is Still Deficient

»  Hotmail Users: Wondering Where Your Email Has Gone? Look in Your Junkfolder - Hotmail Requiring Sender ID

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

1 Comment »

  1. Microsoft Takes Sender I.D.?s Case to the FTC Authentication Summit
    Despite the miserable failure suffered by Microsoft?s efforts to win support for their Sender I.D. email authentication system, with such august institutions the Apache project, the Debian project, and even the IETF?s authentication working group all r…

    Trackback by Lockergnome's IT Professionals — 11/10/2004 @ 3:00 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 11/10/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!