Microsoft SMTP Security Flaw Affects the Masses   - 1,582 Views, 4 Comments

Summary: In the flurry of more than twenty security updates which Microsoft released last week, it was easy to overlook one particularly insidious hole: a flaw in SMTP affecting Windows XP, Windows Server, and Exchange Server. There are probably a few computers ...

Previous Article « Handful of Zombie Networks Responsible for All Phishing Attacks
Read Next Article » Bad Enough it’s an Email Worm, Now MyDoom is Rude, Too

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

In the flurry of more than twenty security updates which Microsoft released last week, it was easy to overlook one particularly insidious hole: a flaw in SMTP affecting Windows XP, Windows Server, and Exchange Server. There are probably a few computers out there running one or the other of these systems.

SMTP stands for “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol”, and is one of the standard components, used by most operating systems, through which computers talk to each other during the sending and receiving of email. As you might imagine, it’s ubiquitous in its deployment.

And no little flaw, this. Rather a great big hole you could drive the proverbial Mack truck through. According to the Microsoft site, “An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of an affected system, including installing programs; viewing, changing, or deleting data; or creating new accounts that have full privileges.”

So, if you or someone you love is running Windows XP 2003, Windows Server 2003, or Exchange Server 2003, run, don’t walk, to http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS04-035.mspx and get the appropriate update.

You can read more about this here.

Microsoft SMTP Security Flaw Affects the Masses

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Handful of Zombie Networks Responsible for All Phishing Attacks
Read Next Article » Bad Enough it’s an Email Worm, Now MyDoom is Rude, Too

Read more:

»  Two More Windows Patches from Microsoft

»  New Critical Internet Explorer (IE) Flaw Involves Msdds.dll

»  Microsoft Announces Patch for “Help Flaw” Security Hole

»  Outlook Express Flaw Elevated to Higher Risk

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

4 Comments »

  1. Hmmm… how about toning down the warnings a bit. You imply that Windows XP is at risk in Lockergnome and blog versions of your message. However your terminology is not accurate.
    MS does NOT refer to their Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003 as Windows XP 2003. However, you do, and by doing so, unnesessarily cause alarm and panic in the millions of users of the 32bit Windows XP who might think that their systems are at risk, and waste inordinate amounts of time investigating and trying to download unnecessary patches, clogging the MS servers etc. Lets not panic the masses shall we, it may be more of a problem than the one you are trying to fix.

    Comment by Jim — 10/23/2004 @ 9:11 am

  2. it is indeed the case that the version of Windows XP which is affected by this issue is Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003.

    Aunty regrets any confusion which may have been caused. It was anticipated that anyone reading Aunty’s post about the problem would naturally follow the link in that post to the Microsoft site, where they would see the full list of affected and unaffected software, and thus not “waste inordinate amounts of time investigating and trying to download unnecessary patches, clogging the MS servers, etc.”. But perhaps Aunty was assuming too much intelligence on the part of her gentle readers.

    Naaaah.

    Aunty

    Comment by Aunty Spam — 10/25/2004 @ 2:53 am

  3. Amen Aunty! :-)

    Comment by John — 10/25/2004 @ 2:25 pm

  4. WHAT IS MY VAT ID? CRISTIAN FROM ROMANIA

    Comment by URSA BEAR — 4/1/2005 @ 6:38 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 10/22/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!