Microsoft Says Partnering with Yahoo Search Illegal - IF Google Does it Instead of Microsoft   - 2,065 Views,

Summary: In a move that can only be described as, at best, disingenuous, Microsoft testified this week before the U.S. Congress that if Yahoo were allowed to partner with Google in a search advertising deal, it would, they implied, be an illegal monopoly. Oh, right, but if Microsoft buys Yahoo for the very same reason, that's ok??

Previous Article « What Is Your Starbucks Name? The Original Starbucks Name Generator
Read Next Article » How to Delete Internet History and Search History from Internet Explorer, Safari, IE7, Firefox and Google Toolbar

  Follow Anne on Twitter

In a move that can only be described as, at best, disingenuous, Microsoft testified this week before the U.S. Congress that if Yahoo were allowed to partner with Google in a search advertising deal, it would, they implied, be an illegal monopoly. Oh, right, but if Microsoft buys Yahoo for the very same reason, that’s ok??

Legal counsel for Microsoft testified before Congress that if Yahoo and Google were allowed to proceed with the business agreement, it would put Google in “a position to own (the Internet) gateway and the information that flows through it.”

“If that happens, Congress won’t need to enact a federal privacy policy, we will already have a national privacy policy - Google’s privacy policy,” said Microsoft attorney Brad Smith.

Smith also observed that this would allow “one company” to be situated to control 90% of the advertising on the Internet, and that shouldn’t be allowed. This must be that new math - where Google + Yahoo working together = 1 company, but Microsoft buying Yahoo and absorbing them to do exactly the same thing does not. Huh?

Smith then lamented that if Yahoo and Google are allowed to proceed with the plan, it will hurt US businesses where it counts - in their pocket - as they could have to pay more for the ad that they already buy from Yahoo.

Now mind you, Microsoft - the company crying foul - is the very same company that itself tried to pull off the exact same deal and advantage with Yahoo this year - and in fact is still trying to grab Yahoo - despite being roundly rebuffed by Yahoo at least twice.

Is there anybody who doesn’t see all of this for exactly what it is? Microsoft desparately wants to overtake its arch-rival, Google, and marrying into the search society through wedlock with Yahoo was their best bet. Their first attempt was trying to woo Yahoo directly - when Yahoo spurned them they started trying to force Yahoo into bed with them, even getting Yahoo’s father, Carl Icahn, to instruct Yahoo to marry Microsoft. Now this. Like the rejected suitor they are - now, apparently, if Microsoft can’t have them - then nobody should have them.

Better watch out, Yahoo - the next step will be acid in your face in a dark alley.

Strained metaphors aside, testifying against Google partnering with Yahoo to do the exact same thing that Microsoft wants to do with Yahoo demonstrates a brazen chutzpah the likes of to which only Microsoft can ascend. Though, not surprising for company that got its start like this.

Microsoft Says Partnering with Yahoo Search Illegal - IF Google Does it Instead of Microsoft

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « What Is Your Starbucks Name? The Original Starbucks Name Generator
Read Next Article » How to Delete Internet History and Search History from Internet Explorer, Safari, IE7, Firefox and Google Toolbar

Read more:

»  Google, the Default Search Engine for Firefox, Opera and Safari, Complains that MSN is the Default Search Engine for IE7

»  Court Stops ex-Microsoft Kai-Fu Lee from Starting Job at Google

»  Google Nips Mark Lucovsky - Distinguished Microsoft Engineer - from Microsoft

»  Kai-Fu Lee Can Work at Google, Says Judge

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Google, Microsoft, Yahoo

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 7/17/2008
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!