Microsoft Breathes New Life Into Sender I.D. - AOL on Resuscitatation Team   10/26/2004 - 938 views, 2 Comments

Summary: There is a new chapter in the debacle which started with Microsoft's extending and embracing of SPF and its advocate, Meng Weng Wong, and which culiminated in the collapse of an empire (well, ok, of the IETF working group tasked with evaluating Sender ...

Previous Article « Company wants to end spam by reinventing the Internet
Read Next Article » This Isn’t the Kind of Website Protection We Mean! Is Your Computer Complicit in Online Extortion?


There is a new chapter in the debacle which started with Microsoft’s extending and embracing of SPF and its advocate, Meng Weng Wong, and which culiminated in the collapse of an empire (well, ok, of the IETF working group tasked with evaluating Sender I.D.) due to concerns about the scopes of both the Sender I.D. patent application and Microsoft’s licensing scheme, and following the denouncement of Sender I.D. by AOL and the Apache Foundation, among others.

Microsoft announced yesterday that it has reworked the patent application, along with addressing some technical concerns, and has resubmitted Sender I.D. to the IETF for new consideration.

Attendantly, AOL has announced that it will now support Sender I.D., along with its ongoing support for SPF.

Where this will all end is anyone’s guess, but the smart money is still on publishing SPF records, as it has a broader adoption platform already, has none of the uncertainty or scandal attached, and is inherently open source, while anything Microsoft is inherently anti-open source (see CIO’s in-depth and interesting article about this latter, in which they make a good case that “Microsoft’s policy priorities (include) limiting the adoption of open-source software”).

Plus, ultimately, any email receiver worth worrying about will be checking SPF records even if they are also checking for Sender I.D., while the reverse will not necessarily be true, and, indeed, it has been suggested that the new version of Sender I.D. may itself provide for checking of SPF records. If that is the case, then it may indeed be that Microsoft has learned a lesson, as this would provide adopters with the best of both technologies (Sender I.D. and SPF check different aspects of incoming email), and would be the adult (and business-smart) thing to do.

You can read more about this here, here and here.

Get FREE email alerts of new Internet Patrol stories!
    *We never share your email address with anyone

Email Address:
Date of first visit:
How you found us:

Be sure to watch for the confirmation email!

Subscribe
to The Internet Patrol on your cell phone    Email the link for this page to a friend!

Read more:

»  Apache and Debian Tell Microsoft that Sender I.D. is Still Deficient

»  Hotmail Users: Wondering Where Your Email Has Gone? Look in Your Junkfolder - Hotmail Requiring Sender ID

»  Gmail “Message left on server” Message - What it Means

»  Microsoft Takes Sender I.D.’s Case to the FTC Authentication Summit

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Email Hosting, Internet Providers, Spam Blockers, Windows

 

2 Comments »

  1. Aunty Spam’s Net Patrol…

    Comment by Lockergnome's IT Professionals — 10/26/2004 @ 11:53 am

  2. Apache and Debian Tell Microsoft that Sender I.D. is Still Deficien
    As Aunty reported back in October, Microsoft reintroduced its roundly rejected Sender I.D. proposal, after, it says, reworking it a bit to meet some of the objections which did it in the first time. And true, to their credit, they…

    Trackback by Lockergnome's IT Professionals — 11/5/2004 @ 12:17 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!