<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maryland Anti-Spam Law Held Unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/maryland-anti-spam-law-held-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/maryland-anti-spam-law-held-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lockergnome's Net Patrol</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/maryland-anti-spam-law-held-unconstitutional/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Lockergnome's Net Patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=227#comment-638</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Maryland Anti-Spam Law Held Unconstitutional&lt;/strong&gt;
A Maryland judge held this week that Maryland?s anti-spam statute is unconstitutional. His reasoning is that the law seeks to regulate business which either is conducted from or through other states, over which Maryland does not properly have jurisdict...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maryland Anti-Spam Law Held Unconstitutional</strong><br />
A Maryland judge held this week that Maryland?s anti-spam statute is unconstitutional. His reasoning is that the law seeks to regulate business which either is conducted from or through other states, over which Maryland does not properly have jurisdict&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
