<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Level3 Issues Statement About Its Blocking All Cogent Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/level3-issues-statement-about-its-blocking-all-cogent-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/level3-issues-statement-about-its-blocking-all-cogent-traffic/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/level3-issues-statement-about-its-blocking-all-cogent-traffic/#comment-2621</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1106#comment-2621</guid>
		<description>My disappointment in Level3's irresponsible conduct is beyond words.  Thanks to their petty nonsense, network connectivity for my systems is experiencing sporadic outages.  Sites such as google.com cannot be reached, and other sites cannot reach my customer's sites.  This is patently churlish conduct from a supposed industry giant.

Martinelli recommends a class-action lawsuit.  I cannot yet subscribe to this idea, but if this problem continues as it has thus far, I can see no reason but to recommend extralegal sanctions against Level3 and their so-called "executives."  They have acted in bad faith and that is not simply inadvisable, it is inexcusable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My disappointment in Level3&#8217;s irresponsible conduct is beyond words.  Thanks to their petty nonsense, network connectivity for my systems is experiencing sporadic outages.  Sites such as google.com cannot be reached, and other sites cannot reach my customer&#8217;s sites.  This is patently churlish conduct from a supposed industry giant.</p>
<p>Martinelli recommends a class-action lawsuit.  I cannot yet subscribe to this idea, but if this problem continues as it has thus far, I can see no reason but to recommend extralegal sanctions against Level3 and their so-called &#8220;executives.&#8221;  They have acted in bad faith and that is not simply inadvisable, it is inexcusable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinelli</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/level3-issues-statement-about-its-blocking-all-cogent-traffic/#comment-2617</link>
		<dc:creator>martinelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1106#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>Level 3 and Cogent should still be hit with a majorly damaging class action lawsuit as an example to the rest of the internet traffic carriers. It was completely irresponsible and damaging to their customers who have come to rely on the internet for data transmission, so why shouldn't there be consequences to them as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Level 3 and Cogent should still be hit with a majorly damaging class action lawsuit as an example to the rest of the internet traffic carriers. It was completely irresponsible and damaging to their customers who have come to rely on the internet for data transmission, so why shouldn&#8217;t there be consequences to them as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
