ISP RoadRunner Must Give Up Identity of User Claimed to Slander Public Relations Society of America’s Bolton   - 2,773 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: A New York judge has ruled that Internet service provider RoadRunner must reveal the identity of a customer who sent email to the Public Relations Society of America's board of directors, claiming that the Public Relations Society of America's executive director, Catherine A. ...

Previous Article « MSN Joins Google and Yahoo in Blocking Chinese Users from Accessing, Using Forbidden Terms and Content
Read Next Article » Don’t Drink and Carry Nude Pictures of Yourself on your Cell Phone

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

A New York judge has ruled that Internet service provider RoadRunner must reveal the identity of a customer who sent email to the Public Relations Society of America’s board of directors, claiming that the Public Relations Society of America’s executive director, Catherine A. Bolton, was not fit for the position.

The anonymous sender, labelled “Doe” in the lawsuit now being pursued by both Bolton and the PRSA, is apparently an employee or former employee of the Public Relations Society of America, and claimed in the email that Bolton “is a fast-talking nonstrategic PR person. She cannot manage or lead an organization. Her quarterly reports to staff are garbage, often met with rolling eyes.”

The Court, in ruling that Bolton (although not the PRSA) had met the legal requirements necessary to compel the disclosure of the sender’s identity, held that Bolton had demonstrated that there was an action for defamation, her request had been targeted and specific, that she needed the information, and that there was no other way to obtain the information, and this was weighed against Doe’s likely expectation of privacy.

Of course, the conundrum here is that the truth is a defense to a charge of defamation. How ironic it will be if after all of this, it turns out that the allegations in the email were absolutely true!

ISP RoadRunner Must Give Up Identity of User Claimed to Slander Public Relations Society of America’s Bolton

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « MSN Joins Google and Yahoo in Blocking Chinese Users from Accessing, Using Forbidden Terms and Content
Read Next Article » Don’t Drink and Carry Nude Pictures of Yourself on your Cell Phone

Read more:

»  Feds Set Sights on ISP Records, Vote to Protect Libraries and Book Stores from Patriot Act

»  Search for Charity - Your MSN Searches Contribute to Children’s Charity with “Make Your Clicks Count” Campaign

»  Lawsuit Against MySpace Dismissed! Lawsuit by 14 Year Old Alleging Sexual Assault Against Pete Solis and MySpace Dead in the Water

»  Company Creates “Identity Theft Protection” Software

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Email Hosting, Internet Law, Internet Providers, Privacy

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »

  1. If “Doe” had sent a snail mail letter, would the US postal service have to reveal their identity too?
    Or if he called it in…would Ma Bell be accountable? Give me a break…suck it up woman.

    Comment by Tony — 6/14/2005 @ 2:10 pm

  2. I believe in the rights of privacy. However in todays volital society I strongly support the Patriot Act and the appropriate Governments agencies to have the ability to use whatever reasonable avenues to enforce the countrys security. I really do not understand fully the importance of the case in question. So, I support only those areas that may envolve criminal or national security issues. Thanks! Bob H.

    Comment by Robert E. Hadik — 6/17/2005 @ 4:48 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 6/13/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!