Comments on: IBM Not Spamming Spammers! FairUCE is About Fair Use, Not Abuse! http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/ibm-not-spamming-spammers-fairuce-is-about-fair-use-not-abuse/ Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:03:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Dorian Peters http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/ibm-not-spamming-spammers-fairuce-is-about-fair-use-not-abuse/#comment-1425 Dorian Peters Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:03:07 +0000 /?p=468#comment-1425 While IBM may or may not have gotten it right, Solid Oak Software certainly did today with MXRate that actually identifies the spammer by an historical audit trail of email sent. While IBM may or may not have gotten it right, Solid Oak Software certainly did today with MXRate that actually identifies the spammer by an historical audit trail of email sent.

]]> By: Richi Jennings http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/ibm-not-spamming-spammers-fairuce-is-about-fair-use-not-abuse/#comment-1419 Richi Jennings Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:21:40 +0000 /?p=468#comment-1419 Well, yes, but the WSJ got it similarly wrong. From the quotes attributed to an IBM exec, I'm worried that this mis-reporting might actually be IBM's fault. Well, yes, but the WSJ got it similarly wrong. From the quotes attributed to an IBM exec, I’m worried that this mis-reporting might actually be IBM’s fault.

]]> By: Lindsey McMillen http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/ibm-not-spamming-spammers-fairuce-is-about-fair-use-not-abuse/#comment-1418 Lindsey McMillen Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:30:42 +0000 /?p=468#comment-1418 You are so right! Those who are not technically knowledgeable (about technology) should not report on technology. Remind me again please, what, if anything, is CNN technically knowlegeable about? It certainly isn't the ability to broadcast their programs with a stable level in the volume of it's audio transmissions (Broadcast of remote, live, programming is understandable and excluded). When I watch and listen to CNN I'm constantly having to adjust the volume. The one thing you can't count on is that the volume level for commercials broadcasted on CNN will be MUCH louder than the fluctuating volume of it's programs. You are so right! Those who are not technically knowledgeable (about technology) should not report on technology.

Remind me again please, what, if anything, is CNN technically knowlegeable about? It certainly isn’t the ability to broadcast their programs with a stable level in the volume of it’s audio transmissions (Broadcast of remote, live, programming is understandable and excluded). When I watch and listen to CNN I’m constantly having to adjust the volume. The one thing you can’t count on is that the volume level for commercials broadcasted on CNN will be MUCH louder than the fluctuating volume of it’s programs.

]]>