<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Go from Spamming to Prison in 6 Short Months</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timmer</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>Wow.  The mind boggles at the thought of someone whose business model includes theft and trespass and considers it "legitimate".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  The mind boggles at the thought of someone whose business model includes theft and trespass and considers it &#8220;legitimate&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter moshou</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2521</link>
		<dc:creator>peter moshou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2521</guid>
		<description>yes.  a misdemeanor that doesn't ruin your life as mine as now been</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes.  a misdemeanor that doesn&#8217;t ruin your life as mine as now been</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmer</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2520</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2520</guid>
		<description>So, you *don't* admit to fraud, but you do admit to trespass and theft of service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you *don&#8217;t* admit to fraud, but you do admit to trespass and theft of service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter moshou</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>peter moshou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>No Timmer you have it backwards.I admit to spamming.What i'm saying is that there was no fraud.I was running a legitimate business with 20 employees.All this law does is take common law trespass and theft of services, which are both class B misdemeanors punishable by no more than 90 days MAXIMUM(first offense would get you a fine) and turn it into a 3 year federal felony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Timmer you have it backwards.I admit to spamming.What i&#8217;m saying is that there was no fraud.I was running a legitimate business with 20 employees.All this law does is take common law trespass and theft of services, which are both class B misdemeanors punishable by no more than 90 days MAXIMUM(first offense would get you a fine) and turn it into a 3 year federal felony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmer</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>The heading of that section reads "Sec. 1037. Fraud and related activity in connection with electronic mail".

So you won't admit to spamming, but you will admit to committing fraud, trespass, and theft of service, all because of the "anti-commerze netnazis" who are trying to stop your "ledjimit bidness".  This is sooo Rule 3 in action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The heading of that section reads &#8220;Sec. 1037. Fraud and related activity in connection with electronic mail&#8221;.</p>
<p>So you won&#8217;t admit to spamming, but you will admit to committing fraud, trespass, and theft of service, all because of the &#8220;anti-commerze netnazis&#8221; who are trying to stop your &#8220;ledjimit bidness&#8221;.  This is sooo Rule 3 in action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter moshou</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2411</link>
		<dc:creator>peter moshou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 01:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2411</guid>
		<description>"Florida spammer Peter Moshou just might beg to differ."
Wrong. i wasn't arrested for spamming at all .... the staute of the can spam which i have decided to plead guilty to (not been found guilty of) does not state the word "unsolicited" anywhere and shouldn't even be in this bill. It is just a way for corporations to stop the average man from making money in "their" world.

http://www.spamlaws.com/federal/108s877.shtml

`(a) IN GENERAL- Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly--

`(1) accesses a protected computer without authorization, and intentionally initiates the transmission of multiple commercial electronic mail messages from or through such computer or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Florida spammer Peter Moshou just might beg to differ.&#8221;<br />
Wrong. i wasn&#8217;t arrested for spamming at all &#8230;. the staute of the can spam which i have decided to plead guilty to (not been found guilty of) does not state the word &#8220;unsolicited&#8221; anywhere and shouldn&#8217;t even be in this bill. It is just a way for corporations to stop the average man from making money in &#8220;their&#8221; world.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spamlaws.com/federal/108s877.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.spamlaws.com/federal/108s877.shtml</a></p>
<p>`(a) IN GENERAL- Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly&#8211;</p>
<p>`(1) accesses a protected computer without authorization, and intentionally initiates the transmission of multiple commercial electronic mail messages from or through such computer or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmer</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>I'll celebrate if Moshou actually *gets* 3 years in prison and a $350000 fine.  Phoenix Avatar (Daniel Lin, et al) got *no* jail time and a $230000 fine, which was limited to their available cash (app $20K).  If that's any indicator, Peter Moshou can expect to be rapped firmly upon each wrist.  Meanwhile, Scott Richter, Eddy Marin, Andrew Westmoreland, and Atriks spam merrily away.

BTW, it is worth noting that the Earthlink judgement against Carmack was pre-CANSPAM,and when he was later convicted on criminal charges, it was for fraud under NY state law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll celebrate if Moshou actually *gets* 3 years in prison and a $350000 fine.  Phoenix Avatar (Daniel Lin, et al) got *no* jail time and a $230000 fine, which was limited to their available cash (app $20K).  If that&#8217;s any indicator, Peter Moshou can expect to be rapped firmly upon each wrist.  Meanwhile, Scott Richter, Eddy Marin, Andrew Westmoreland, and Atriks spam merrily away.</p>
<p>BTW, it is worth noting that the Earthlink judgement against Carmack was pre-CANSPAM,and when he was later convicted on criminal charges, it was for fraud under NY state law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/how-to-go-from-spamming-to-prison-in-6-short-months/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 04:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=794#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>Aunty...
I filter through 100 spam emails a day, and I know you're fighting an even bigger load.  I have but one question:

Where's our cut?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aunty&#8230;<br />
I filter through 100 spam emails a day, and I know you&#8217;re fighting an even bigger load.  I have but one question:</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s our cut?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
