2005

Summary: For all of you naysayers who insist that the Federal anti-spam law should be called the "YOU-CAN-SPAM" act instead of the CAN-SPAM act, and who say that it will never be a useful tool, Florida spammer Peter Moshou just might beg to differ. In ...
Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: andrew westmoreland spam, eddy marin spam email, moshou twitter, peter moshou

Previous Article « Best Place to Advertise Your Website: On Someone’s Forehead?
Read Next Article » Trojan Postcard Targets Windows Users

For all of you naysayers who insist that the Federal anti-spam law should be called the “YOU-CAN-SPAM” act instead of the CAN-SPAM act, and who say that it will never be a useful tool, Florida spammer Peter Moshou just might beg to differ.

In what has to be one of the shortest start-to-finish spam lawsuits in history (and let’s face it, the entire history of anti-spam law and lawsuits is just a few years old), Earthlink filed a lawsuit under CAN-SPAM in January - that’s January 2005 - against Moshou, and the suit concluded this week - that’s under six months later, with Peter Moshou ultimately admitting his guilt. Moshou now faces up to 3 years in prison, and $350,000 in fines.

Earthlink, along with MSN and AOL, have established themselves as really going to the mat to take spammers down in court. In 2003 they secured a $16.4 million judgment against Buffalo Spammer Howard Carmack.

Sharing is Caring! Please help us get the word out by sharing this article on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+!

Previous Article « Best Place to Advertise Your Website: On Someone’s Forehead?
Read Next Article » Trojan Postcard Targets Windows Users

You May Also Like:

EarthLink Evidence Leads to Criminal Conviction in ‘Timeshare Spammer’ Case (News Release)

Top Four ISPs Wrap Lawsuit Noose Around Spammer’s Necks

Earthlink Files Four New Lawsuits Under That “Miserable Failure”, CAN-SPAM

Former AOL Employee Who Sold Email Addresses Facing Two Years in Prison

Anti Spammers are Lamers, Says Spammer

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Internet Providers, Spam, Spam Blockers

8 Comments - Newest First »

Wow. The mind boggles at the thought of someone whose business model includes theft and trespass and considers it “legitimate”.

Comment by Timmer — 9/17/2005 @ 8:48 am
yes. a misdemeanor that doesn’t ruin your life as mine as now been

Comment by peter moshou — 9/16/2005 @ 9:59 am
So, you *don’t* admit to fraud, but you do admit to trespass and theft of service?

Comment by Timmer — 9/16/2005 @ 9:13 am
No Timmer you have it backwards.I admit to spamming.What i’m saying is that there was no fraud.I was running a legitimate business with 20 employees.All this law does is take common law trespass and theft of services, which are both class B misdemeanors punishable by no more than 90 days MAXIMUM(first offense would get you a fine) and turn it into a 3 year federal felony.

Comment by peter moshou — 9/16/2005 @ 7:35 am
The heading of that section reads “Sec. 1037. Fraud and related activity in connection with electronic mail”.

So you won’t admit to spamming, but you will admit to committing fraud, trespass, and theft of service, all because of the “anti-commerze netnazis” who are trying to stop your “ledjimit bidness”. This is sooo Rule 3 in action.

Comment by Timmer — 9/15/2005 @ 10:25 am
“Florida spammer Peter Moshou just might beg to differ.”
Wrong. i wasn’t arrested for spamming at all …. the staute of the can spam which i have decided to plead guilty to (not been found guilty of) does not state the word “unsolicited” anywhere and shouldn’t even be in this bill. It is just a way for corporations to stop the average man from making money in “their” world.

http://www.spamlaws.com/federal/108s877.shtml

`(a) IN GENERAL- Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly–

`(1) accesses a protected computer without authorization, and intentionally initiates the transmission of multiple commercial electronic mail messages from or through such computer or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

Comment by peter moshou — 8/27/2005 @ 5:25 pm
I’ll celebrate if Moshou actually *gets* 3 years in prison and a $350000 fine. Phoenix Avatar (Daniel Lin, et al) got *no* jail time and a $230000 fine, which was limited to their available cash (app $20K). If that’s any indicator, Peter Moshou can expect to be rapped firmly upon each wrist. Meanwhile, Scott Richter, Eddy Marin, Andrew Westmoreland, and Atriks spam merrily away.

BTW, it is worth noting that the Earthlink judgement against Carmack was pre-CANSPAM,and when he was later convicted on criminal charges, it was for fraud under NY state law.

Comment by Timmer — 7/20/2005 @ 11:01 am
Aunty…
I filter through 100 spam emails a day, and I know you’re fighting an even bigger load. I have but one question:

Where’s our cut?

Comment by Jonathan Murray — 6/30/2005 @ 8:11 pm

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. In some cases, after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol. All that said, ads by Google are not our recommendations, and are selected and served by Google, and we do not control what those ads display.