<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hormel Loses Law Case Over the Word &#8220;Spam&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/hormel-loses-law-case-over-the-word-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/hormel-loses-law-case-over-the-word-spam/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/hormel-loses-law-case-over-the-word-spam/#comment-12579</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1429#comment-12579</guid>
		<description>Actually, Ted, it stands for SPiced hAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Ted, it stands for SPiced hAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Bruner</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/hormel-loses-law-case-over-the-word-spam/#comment-12415</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1429#comment-12415</guid>
		<description>SPAM: Swift Premium (H)AM. It was introduced by Swift &#38; Company Meat Packing before computers were even made with vacuum tubes. (They were struggling for existance - embryonic, you might say.) Corporate takeovers and time and now Hormel considers it theirs. C'est la vie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPAM: Swift Premium (H)AM. It was introduced by Swift &amp; Company Meat Packing before computers were even made with vacuum tubes. (They were struggling for existance - embryonic, you might say.) Corporate takeovers and time and now Hormel considers it theirs. C&#8217;est la vie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob H.</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/hormel-loses-law-case-over-the-word-spam/#comment-12412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1429#comment-12412</guid>
		<description>If Hormel wanted to preserve their trademark, they should  have remained with their Meat Products and stayed away from the Internet with the exception a Web Adress. 
IMHO.. Spam is too Salty, and SPAM is trash mail that wastes my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hormel wanted to preserve their trademark, they should  have remained with their Meat Products and stayed away from the Internet with the exception a Web Adress.<br />
IMHO.. Spam is too Salty, and SPAM is trash mail that wastes my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/hormel-loses-law-case-over-the-word-spam/#comment-12407</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1429#comment-12407</guid>
		<description>If Hormel wanted to preserve their trademark, they should have done something way back when Monty Python did their Spam skit, since that's what inspired the use of the term for "unsolicited commercial email."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hormel wanted to preserve their trademark, they should have done something way back when Monty Python did their Spam skit, since that&#8217;s what inspired the use of the term for &#8220;unsolicited commercial email.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
