Help Spread Holiday Hoaxes: The Internet Patrol Gets Taken In   12/27/2004 - 1,195 views, 5 Comments

Summary: There's an old saying that it's not nice to fool Mother Nature. Well, it's not nice to fool us, either. But that's just what Alek Komarnitsky did with his Christmas lights which you could turn on and off with your web browser. Or, rather, ...

Previous Article « Help Spread Holiday Cheer: Donate Bandwidth for This Guy’s Christmas Lights
Read Next Article » AOL Users See Sharp Decrease in Spam

 

ORDER YOUR POPCORN TODAY AND HELP US MAKE OUR GOAL!

There’s an old saying that it’s not nice to fool Mother Nature.

Well, it’s not nice to fool us, either. But that’s just what Alek Komarnitsky did with his Christmas lights which you could turn on and off with your web browser.

Or, rather, which you couldn’t.

Yes, it seems that the whole thing was a rather elaborate hoax by Mr. Komarnitsky, and was actually accomplished by his rotating a series of several fixed photos of his holiday lights in different states of illumination.

Says Mr. Komarnitsky, in a statement on his web site:

“First, let me say there was never any malicious intent here - it started out a “technology puzzle” and I figured I could provide some holiday cheer to folks. Each year, it got bigger and bigger … and then in 2004, it went exponential, as a local story went out on the National AP wire and was picked up by a LOT of US papers and then internationally. I then got deluged with dozens of radio interviews, a number of TV spots (including a helicopter ride from Channel-7 to report “live” on my blinking christmas lights), millions of hits on my web site, and over a thousand Emails - I lost track!

So while I debated keeping it “secret” and continuing to provide holiday cheer to people around the world, it has gotten too big and started to become a distraction to my family life. Also, while I’ve enjoyed my 15 seconds of fame, I’m ready to return back to “boring” normal life. So while I think I could pull it off another year, I’m “coming out” just after Christmas/2004 with the assistance of the best newspaper in the world - The Wall Street Journal as Charles Forelle writes “High-Tech Holiday Light Display Draws Everyone But the Skeptics.”

I apologize to those people who may be angry with me, but hopefully most will see the humor in the whole situation … and realize that my attempt to bring joy and a smile to people’s faces was successful.”

Successful or not by his standards, I offer my most abject apologies to you all for unwittingly helping to spread this hoax and leading you astray. Hopefully you are among the people who enjoyed the site regardless, and if not, well, I really don’t blame you.

Previous Article « Help Spread Holiday Cheer: Donate Bandwidth for This Guy’s Christmas Lights
Read Next Article » AOL Users See Sharp Decrease in Spam

Get a FREE summary of the week's articles every Friday!
(You can stop it any time!)
    *We never share your email address with anyone

Email Address:
Date of first visit:
How you found us:

Be sure to watch for the confirmation email!

Subscribe
to The Internet Patrol on your cell phone    Email the link for this page to a friend!

Read more:

»  Use Your (Windows) Power for Good

»  Top Ten Viruses and Hoaxes Reported to Sophos in May 2005 (News Release)

»  Help Spread Holiday Cheer: Donate Bandwidth for This Guy’s Christmas Lights

»  The Star Trek Christmas Tree

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Oddities

 

5 Comments »

  1. Help Spread Holiday Hoaxes: Aunty Gets Taken In
    There?s an old saying that it?s not nice to fool Mother Nature. Well, it?s not nice to fool Aunty Spam, either. But that?s just what Alek Komarnitsky did with his Christmas lights which you could turn on and off with…

    Trackback by Lockergnome's Windows Fanatics — 12/27/2004 @ 10:18 pm

  2. lighten up everybody, nobody got hurt, no bad virus was sent out. Maybe it’s time to remember how to laugh at our self’s again.

    Comment by larry — 12/28/2004 @ 3:31 am

  3. I tried the specificmail.com spam filter you endorse above and found it to be ad ware. Do you consider this to be an acceptable tradeoff for spam…

    Comment by Mike T — 12/28/2004 @ 8:24 am

  4. Mike wrote: “I tried the specificmail.com spam filter you endorse above and found it to be ad ware. Do you consider this to be an acceptable tradeoff for spam…”

    Dear Mike, Aunty has never endorsed a “specificmail.com” on these pages, or elsewhere. Indeed, Aunty is not familiar with a product called specificmail.com, or SpecificMail, or anything similar. Kissy kissy, Aunty

    Comment by Aunty — 12/28/2004 @ 9:15 am

  5. Aunty, Mike T. is complaining about one of the “Ads by Google” that comes up on your site. It lists http://www.specificmail.com, http://www.qurb.com, http://www.policypatrol.com, and http://www.barracudanetworks.com as I enter this comment on the page.

    Comment by Joel F. — 12/28/2004 @ 4:54 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!