<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feds Demand Your Search Records from Google in Lawsuit Where Your Privacy Gives Way to Witch Hunt for Child Porn Searchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/government-takes-legal-action-against-google-for-refusing-doj-demand-for-user-search-records-in-lawsuit-while-aol-yahoo-and-msn-comply/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/government-takes-legal-action-against-google-for-refusing-doj-demand-for-user-search-records-in-lawsuit-while-aol-yahoo-and-msn-comply</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/government-takes-legal-action-against-google-for-refusing-doj-demand-for-user-search-records-in-lawsuit-while-aol-yahoo-and-msn-comply#comment-581968</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1242#comment-581968</guid>
		<description>This is not a hard decision at all ....think of the 100's or 1000's of lives that have been sacrificed to protect our privacy against intrusive government fishing expeditions like these. It's unfortunate that there are people who prey on the innocent but I for one will not forgo even one small freedom that I now possess to stop a few children from being victimized ...That may sound cold and callous but guess what life isn't fair and there will always be those who will suffer at the hands of others and forgoing our rights to be free from government intrusion into our lives is more important than anything else we have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a hard decision at all &#8230;.think of the 100&#8217;s or 1000&#8217;s of lives that have been sacrificed to protect our privacy against intrusive government fishing expeditions like these. It&#8217;s unfortunate that there are people who prey on the innocent but I for one will not forgo even one small freedom that I now possess to stop a few children from being victimized &#8230;That may sound cold and callous but guess what life isn&#8217;t fair and there will always be those who will suffer at the hands of others and forgoing our rights to be free from government intrusion into our lives is more important than anything else we have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Namora</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/government-takes-legal-action-against-google-for-refusing-doj-demand-for-user-search-records-in-lawsuit-while-aol-yahoo-and-msn-comply#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Namora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1242#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>It really comes down to how far you are willing to let Big Brother go before you bother to exert yourself to protect the rights and freedoms that countless American men and women have died for in order for them to be passed on to you. I truly feel that the current gaggle of hacks running things in America have given us ample proof of their grasping ways to gain and maintain power and their incompetence to use it wisely. The only thing that this crowd is really good at is clouding issues and misdirection. From the beginning of the 2000 campaign this administration has been engaged in obfuscation and misinformation. I have serious doubts that child pornography is the true reason for the justice department’s request for personal browsing histories. Has anyone forgotten the notices to libraries? You and you alone are responsible for your civil rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really comes down to how far you are willing to let Big Brother go before you bother to exert yourself to protect the rights and freedoms that countless American men and women have died for in order for them to be passed on to you. I truly feel that the current gaggle of hacks running things in America have given us ample proof of their grasping ways to gain and maintain power and their incompetence to use it wisely. The only thing that this crowd is really good at is clouding issues and misdirection. From the beginning of the 2000 campaign this administration has been engaged in obfuscation and misinformation. I have serious doubts that child pornography is the true reason for the justice department’s request for personal browsing histories. Has anyone forgotten the notices to libraries? You and you alone are responsible for your civil rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Shutes</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/government-takes-legal-action-against-google-for-refusing-doj-demand-for-user-search-records-in-lawsuit-while-aol-yahoo-and-msn-comply#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Shutes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1242#comment-3426</guid>
		<description>I am not sure where to take a stand on this issue.  It's time for a lot of us to "put up or shut up."  This is the question we have to decide: are children more harmed by pornography, or are the rest of us more harmed by giving up a little privacy?

One thing I do know: "naked baby pictures" are increasingly Politically Incorrect.  Only perverts would want such pictures.  Or so the P.C. thinking goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure where to take a stand on this issue.  It&#8217;s time for a lot of us to &#8220;put up or shut up.&#8221;  This is the question we have to decide: are children more harmed by pornography, or are the rest of us more harmed by giving up a little privacy?</p>
<p>One thing I do know: &#8220;naked baby pictures&#8221; are increasingly Politically Incorrect.  Only perverts would want such pictures.  Or so the P.C. thinking goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
