Google Sued for Purveying, Profiting from, Child Pornography   - 5,800 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: Google has been sued by New York politician Jeffrey Toback, who claims that Google intentionally provides and promotes - indeed that Google's business plan includes - child pornography.

Previous Article « MySpace Girls Become Playboy Girls - You’ll Be Seeing More of MySpace Girls Jessica, Brittany and Others
Read Next Article » Internet Gambling is Illegal in the US - and Has Doubled in the Past Year

  Follow Anne on Twitter

Google has been sued by a New York politician claiming that Google intentionally provides and promotes - indeed that Google’s business plan includes - child pornography.

The lawsuit, filed by Nassau County Democrat Jeffrey Toback, in the New York Supreme Court (don’t let that wow you - counter-intuitively, the Supreme Court in New York is actually the lowest court in New York’s system - it’s the trial court where all initial lawsuits are filed), claims, among other things, that Google is profiting to the tune of billions of dollars a year by allowing operators of child pornography sites, and providers of “other obscene content” to be located through Google’s search engine, and to advertise their sites and on their sites through Google’s popular AdWords and AdSense programs.

Google, says Toback, “continues to put its economic gains ahead of the interests and well-being of America’s children.”

The complaint goes on to say that Google “is willing to accede to the demands of the Chinese autocrats to block the search term “democracy”, but when it comes to the protection and well-being of our nation’s innocent children, Defendant refuses to spend a dime’s worth of resources to block child pornography from reaching children.”

Of course, Toback admits to being “not the most computer-literate guy”, and also admits that until 3 days ago (after the suit was filed) he didn’t realize that Google has a “SafeSearch” option, which filters out adult material.

But more to the point, Toback apparently didn’t realize that Google fairly zealously fails to display ads either about or on any site which even hints at child pornography, and that if any site which deals in child porn comes to their attention, it is immediately removed from any Google listings and products.

Explained a Google spokesperson, “Child pornography is illegal, and Google prohibits it in our products. When we find or are made aware of any child pornography, we remove it from our products, including our search engine. We also report it to the appropriate law enforcement officials and fully cooperate with the law enforcement community to combat child pornography.”

Of course, hey, why let the facts get in the way of a good lawsuit?

Google Sued for Purveying, Profiting from, Child Pornography

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « MySpace Girls Become Playboy Girls - You’ll Be Seeing More of MySpace Girls Jessica, Brittany and Others
Read Next Article » Internet Gambling is Illegal in the US - and Has Doubled in the Past Year

Read more:

»  Police Crack Internet Child Porn Ring as Child Pornography and the Law Clash

»  Supreme Court Says Advertising Child Pornography with No Real Children or Even With No Children at All Still Punishable Under Law

»  Downloading Porn Is the Same as Making Porn, Says Court

»  Edward Ray Barton Case Overturned On Appeal - Existence of Illegal Files in Cache Only not ‘Possession’

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Google, Internet Law, Over 18

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »

  1. Sure sounds as if Mr. Toback is up for re-election, and in desperate shape in the polls!

    Comment by M P M — 5/17/2006 @ 8:03 am

  2. Google says they remove sites from their listings that exploit children, but it’s not true. I called to report a listing and they said “they did not list sites, their robots do.” Pretty disgusting.

    Comment by Alana Lacheve — 12/19/2007 @ 7:25 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 5/10/2006
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!