Gmail’s Spam Filter Isn’t So Hot, But We Can Get You to Zimbabwe Cheap!   4/18/2004 - 1,484 views, 2 Comments

Summary: I've been testing Google's Gmail for 5 days now, since April 18th. Woohoo. In addition to openly soliciting email to the account, and even posting the address on the web (shedevil@gmail.com), I've forwarded all of my email coming to my other accounts to ...

Previous Article « Gmail, Gmail, GMAIL!
Read Next Article » Anti-Spam Software Provider Announces Nothing New

I’ve been testing Google’s Gmail for 5 days now, since April 18th. Woohoo.

In addition to openly soliciting email to the account, and even posting the address on the web (shedevil@gmail.com), I’ve forwarded all of my email coming to my other accounts to the Gmail account. I wanted to give Gmail a good workout. More specifically, I was very interested in its spam filtering capabilities (well, I would be, wouldn’t I?)

At the end of nearly a week, I can say that my first impressions hold: Gmail’s spam filtering performance, to put it politely, sucks.

Out of a total of 259 pieces of email (in part so low because of the intervening weekend, and in part because I had to turn forwarding off for most of a day because my server and the Gmail server got into an infinite loop argument over whether Gmail should continue to bounce its own bounce messages into perpetuity, my server happily playing the me so forwarding game)..anyways, out of a total of 259 pieces of email, Gmail tagged exactly 11 of them as spam, of which only 4 (fewer than half) were actually spam. That’s 7 pieces of legitimate email shunted to the spam folder - which might be a whole lot more acceptable if Gmail had also managed to catch more than 4 of the *62* pieces of spam represented in that corpus of email. And I’m not talking borderline spam here - I’m talking about serious Logos and Nigerians and Viagra, oh my, spam.

So, let’s see - Gmail’s spam filters shunted 7 pieces of legitimate email to my spam folder, while letting 58 pieces of serious, gnarly spam into my inbox.

Not exactly a stellar performance.

Justin Mason, at taint.org, did a far more substantial test and analysis in his write-up of the Great Gmail/SpamAssassin Spam-Off (ok, I called it that, he actually calls it “Some stats on GMail’s spam filter”). In his test, Gmail demonstrated a false negative (spam in the inbox) rate of greater than 31%.

But still, on the bright side, Gmail’s Adsense targetting is working really well! Why just today, in an email from Mrs. Nwakama Ani, the wife of the late James Ani, a farmer in ZImbabwe, asking me to please help her to export $50million dollars which her late husband amassed, Gmail’s Adsense very thoughtfully offered me “Cheap airline tickets from the USA to Zimbabwe”. You know, just in case I want to go over there and help her personally.

Get FREE email alerts of new Internet Patrol stories!
    *We never share your email address with anyone

Email Address:
Date of first visit:
How you found us:

Subscribe
to The Internet Patrol on your cell phone    Email the link for this page to a friend!

Read more:

»  And you thought Gmail was a privacy nightmare!

»  Care and Feeding of Your Spam Filter (Train, Train, Train)

»  Lawyer Misses Court Because of Spam Filter - Give Aunty Your Stories!

»  SpamAssassin 3.10 Released, with ISIPP’s IADB Sender Accreditation Support

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Email Hosting, Google, Spam, Spam Blockers

 

2 Comments »

  1. Well, you do know that the 419 scam usually involves getting the mark to come out to ‘consumate” the deal.

    Thus the need for cheap airline tickets. You’re usually pretty broke and over-extended by that point anyway.

    Comment by Mickey Chandler — 4/19/2004 @ 8:29 pm

  2. Been running my own test on the spam filters, too. I’ve been soliciting spam to prattboy@gmail.com and have been posting my results at http://gmai.prattboy.net; My results have been a little better than yours so far.

    Any idea how Gmail’s spam filters actually work?

    Comment by Aaron Pratt — 5/10/2004 @ 2:07 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


We apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day!

 
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!