<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC Says &#8220;No&#8221; to Do Not Email List, &#8220;Yes&#8221; to Sender Authentication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/ftc-says-no-to-do-not-email-list-yes-to-sender-authentication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/ftc-says-no-to-do-not-email-list-yes-to-sender-authentication/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spider</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/ftc-says-no-to-do-not-email-list-yes-to-sender-authentication/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Spider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=64#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if AMTP is heading in the right direction?  I've read about it here:
http://amtp.bw.org/ and understand it to be in the process of becoming an official RFC.  Isn't this also a type of sender authentication?  I am convinced that junk mail will never go away, but clear tracking of the sender will certainly keep it under control.  Bring it on!!!

Spider</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if AMTP is heading in the right direction?  I&#8217;ve read about it here:<br />
<a href="http://amtp.bw.org/" rel="nofollow">http://amtp.bw.org/</a> and understand it to be in the process of becoming an official RFC.  Isn&#8217;t this also a type of sender authentication?  I am convinced that junk mail will never go away, but clear tracking of the sender will certainly keep it under control.  Bring it on!!!</p>
<p>Spider</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
