<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida Veterinarian Nails WarDriver Outside His Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=546#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>Did the veterinarian set up a private access point, and Smith broke into it?  Or did the vet set up a public access point, and Smith just connected through it?  There's a big difference.

Was the vet clueless enough to think he had a private access point when he really had a public one?  Were the police clueless enough to not know the difference?  The article doesn't really say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the veterinarian set up a private access point, and Smith broke into it?  Or did the vet set up a public access point, and Smith just connected through it?  There&#8217;s a big difference.</p>
<p>Was the vet clueless enough to think he had a private access point when he really had a public one?  Were the police clueless enough to not know the difference?  The article doesn&#8217;t really say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=546#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>Using an unlocked network is not illegal, They are considered "OPEN NETWORKS"; however, if the network is locked, and hacked into then its illegal.  The airwaves are open.  If you know what youre diong you can pick up a signal from well over 1/4 mile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using an unlocked network is not illegal, They are considered &#8220;OPEN NETWORKS&#8221;; however, if the network is locked, and hacked into then its illegal.  The airwaves are open.  If you know what youre diong you can pick up a signal from well over 1/4 mile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparehead2</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparehead2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 19:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=546#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>That's not quite correct, jon... Blasting a stereo can contravene noise polution laws, and anyone within range is forced to listen- you can't turn off your ability to hear.  On the other hand, even if there's an active, open, unsecured WiFi network in range, a person still has to make a conscious decision to join that network.  You are not being forced to connect to the network the way you are forced to listen to somneone's extra-loud stereo.

I'm not saying the Vet will win in court, but just because the front door is unlocked doesn't mean you have permission to enter- it's just easier to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not quite correct, jon&#8230; Blasting a stereo can contravene noise polution laws, and anyone within range is forced to listen- you can&#8217;t turn off your ability to hear.  On the other hand, even if there&#8217;s an active, open, unsecured WiFi network in range, a person still has to make a conscious decision to join that network.  You are not being forced to connect to the network the way you are forced to listen to somneone&#8217;s extra-loud stereo.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying the Vet will win in court, but just because the front door is unlocked doesn&#8217;t mean you have permission to enter- it&#8217;s just easier to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 17:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=546#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>Did the vet have any encryption? if not he was broad casting "in the clear" and as long as the wardriver was not trying to access the vets data the vet is wasting the courts time
It would be like suing someone for listening to a cd they donâ€™t own because you are blasting your stereo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the vet have any encryption? if not he was broad casting &#8220;in the clear&#8221; and as long as the wardriver was not trying to access the vets data the vet is wasting the courts time<br />
It would be like suing someone for listening to a cd they donâ€™t own because you are blasting your stereo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 05:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=546#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>Anyone using wifi deserves to get wardriven. everyone knows wep has been broken. why not just grease up, bend over and yell TAKE ME!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone using wifi deserves to get wardriven. everyone knows wep has been broken. why not just grease up, bend over and yell TAKE ME!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=546#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>Ha! I think that he was "stealing" bandwidth cause he couldn't afford his own...how can he afford even a BAD lawyer? Nail 'em up I say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I think that he was &#8220;stealing&#8221; bandwidth cause he couldn&#8217;t afford his own&#8230;how can he afford even a BAD lawyer? Nail &#8216;em up I say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/florida-veterinarian-nails-wardriver-outside-his-home#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=546#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>Have to believe even a bad lawyer could beat this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to believe even a bad lawyer could beat this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
